Browse
Search
Agenda 12-04-23; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
Agenda - 12-04-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 12-04-23; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2023 11:11:27 AM
Creation date
11/30/2023 10:59:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/4/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for December 4, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2023\Agenda - 12-04-2023 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> 1 hearing things from Mayor Seils from Carrboro, so she wanted to know what was happening. <br /> 2 She said that it was brought up to the MMC group and it was a very quick no on the recording. <br /> 3 She said that she thought it was interesting because the facilitator was recording the meetings <br /> 4 just to keep track of notes and they told her she could no longer do that. She said that led to her <br /> 5 needing to hire an assistant to come with her so she could keep track of the notes and <br /> 6 discussion. She said that they were concerned they would be limited in what they could say if it <br /> 7 was being recorded. <br /> 8 Chair Bedford said she was one that had concerns about recording the meetings <br /> 9 because of liabilities. She said she says what she is going to say but other people might not. <br /> 10 John Roberts said that the MMC does not meet all of the statutory criteria for the open <br /> 11 meetings laws to apply. He said the more formal the body becomes and the more responsibility <br /> 12 they take on, then there becomes a stronger argument that it is a public body, and all three <br /> 13 jurisdictions could get a slap on the wrist if it is not open to the public. <br /> 14 Commissioner Hamilton said the fact that it is not being recorded and there are <br /> 15 reservations about recording it, makes her wonder what the group is doing. She said if they are <br /> 16 doing the work of the public, it should be open. <br /> 17 Chair Bedford said that if the MMC meetings are limited to discussion about the Greene <br /> 18 Tract then it should be open to the public. She said that just because it is open to the public <br /> 19 does not mean that public comment must be accepted. <br /> 20 John Roberts said that the first criteria for a meeting being subject to the open meetings <br /> 21 law is that it has to be elected or appointed. He said that since this group was not created by <br /> 22 anyone, it does not meet the criteria. <br /> 23 Commissioner Hamilton asked if the interlocal agreement was the creation of this body. <br /> 24 John Roberts said he does not think so because it only assigns certain items to be <br /> 25 discussed and all agreements do that. <br /> 26 Commissioner Portie-Ascott said that transparency is important. She said she is not in <br /> 27 favor of the meetings continuing unless they are open to the public and recorded. <br /> 28 Chair Bedford said that the MMC was specifically cited in the interlocal agreement for <br /> 29 the Greene Tract, and it was voted on by all boards. <br /> 30 John Roberts said that he does not think that creates a public body. He said that assigns <br /> 31 the negotiation of certain aspects of that agreement but did not mandate meetings or set <br /> 32 meeting schedules. He said that it is not a task force in his reading. <br /> 33 Chair Bedford said she read a blog post from the School of Government about functions <br /> 34 that governmental groups might partake in that would make them susceptible to the public <br /> 35 meeting statutes. She said that if the group is deliberating, or hearing presentations, it gets to a <br /> 36 point where they should be careful. She asked what administrative means in this case. <br /> 37 John Roberts said it would be assigning people to do certain tasks and that the county <br /> 38 does not have an administrative board. <br /> 39 Chair Bedford said a member of the public was concerned about the advisory piece. <br /> 40 John Roberts said the MMC certainly provides advice to their Boards. He said while <br /> 41 there is no case law, he said there was a blog post from the School of Government about this <br /> 42 exact type of scenario. He said the author's opinion is that it is not an advisory board. He said <br /> 43 however, that when members are assigned responsibilities, the argument becomes stronger <br /> 44 that they are a public body. He said the safest course is to make these meetings open to the <br /> 45 public. <br /> 46 Chair Bedford said she has learned that they are not making decisions with information <br /> 47 the first time it has been presented. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Commissioner Greene arrived at 8:23 p.m. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Commissioner Richards asked if the MMC should even be making decisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.