Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-16-2004
>
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:28:38 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/16/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040316
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
RES-2004-016 Legislative matters-Transition Flexibility in Implementing the mental Health System Reform
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-017 Leg Matters - tax on Impact of Land Development to pay for school capital facilities
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-018 Resolution Regarding Orange County's 2004 Legislative Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT 4 <br />Although the state was proactive in resubmitting the grant after the first denial, the <br />criteria was so extreme and limited that it was impossible to design a program that would <br />meet the criteria. The criteria included limitations for serving only food stamp recipients, <br />which would exclude many limited resource families that need this vital service. This is <br />hard to understand, since the FY 04 Guidance for Food Stamp Nutrition Education <br />document shows that allowable nutrition education programs include "Breastfeeding <br />education, promotion and support which is coordinated with WIC and which supplements <br />and complements WIC services, rather than supplanting them" The program in North <br />Carolina met these criteria, yet it was not funded. We would appreciate your influence in <br />determining if the review for funds was administered fairly in the Southeastern region. <br />Orange County has also delivered nutrition education to limited resource families for 30 <br />years through the federally funded Expanded Foods and Nutrition Education Program. <br />This program has been very successful in addressing many of the problems that are now <br />in the forefront of issues, such as nutrition, overweight and health concerns. The <br />program teaches families to utilize resources that they have to the fullest extent, and <br />personal success stories of program participants indicate that many have been able to <br />leave public assistance programs. In the current fiscal year, the EFNEP program suffered <br />a 10% cut in funds. In the fiscal 2005 President's budget, the 10% was reinstated, and <br />your support is needed to insure that the money is included in the budget, and that <br />incremental increases be approved in subsequent years. These funds are part of USDA's <br />appropriations under the Smith Lever Programs, and are one of the 3D line items. <br />3. Federal Tobacco Quota Buyout <br />It is Orange County's understanding that if the Quota Buyout is approved, it is proposed <br />that a privately funded buyout in the amount of $100 million would be formed in each of <br />the fiscal years 2005 through 2009. These funds would be used to provide compensation <br />for many tobacco-dependent communities to reduce their dependency on tobacco and <br />thus lower the chances of having to appropriate scarce federal taxpayer dollars in the <br />future to support deteriorating rural tobacco economies. <br />Orange County has routinely been excluded from the possible benefits of funds similar to <br />the one proposed with the Quota Buyout (example: Golden Leaf Foundation) due the <br />County being categorized as an "urban county". Orange County does have some urban <br />areas, but a substantial portion of the County is rural. Orange County requests that, <br />should the Buyout be approved and the tobacco-dependent communities fund be <br />established, the eligibility criteria for funds should be formulated in such a way as to <br />assure that Orange County and other counties receive finding consideration based on the <br />merit of their circumstances rather than on a simple "urban" or "rural" characterization.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.