Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-16-2004
>
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:28:38 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/16/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040316
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
RES-2004-016 Legislative matters-Transition Flexibility in Implementing the mental Health System Reform
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-017 Leg Matters - tax on Impact of Land Development to pay for school capital facilities
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-018 Resolution Regarding Orange County's 2004 Legislative Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />Robert L. Gunn, Esquire <br />Page 2 <br />March 4, 2004 <br />partly located in Orange County and partly located in Chatham <br />County according to the 1989 boundary but is taxed completely in <br />Orange County. <br />Please advise as soon as possible as to the willingness of <br />Chatham County to relocate the Chatham/Orange County boundary as <br />illustrated on the map identified as II. In that regard, there <br />may be an interest on the part of one or, both of the boards of <br />commissioners in holding a public hearing or at least providing <br />specific notice of its public meetings on this point to be sure <br />that any decision to change the boundary to resolve unresolved <br />issues from the 1989 resolution is the last word on this. <br />When we talked by telephone we also discussed the State's <br />interest in the legislature approving a local act which would <br />describe the boundary to correspond with the remonumenting of <br />that boundary by the State. That local act should probably be <br />requested by both Chatham and orange counties. I think it would <br />be prudent, however, to wait to make that request until this <br />latest issue on the boundary is resolved one way or the other. <br />That is, if the boundary will be changed to accommodate the <br />Niemitz, Johnson/Brooke and Renkow properties, the local act <br />should reflect that change. <br />GEG/lsg <br />Enclosures <br />:cc: Barry Jacobs <br />Margaret Brown <br />Moses Carey, Jr. <br />Alice Gordon <br />Stephen Halkiotis <br />John M. Link, Jr. <br />Rod Visser / <br />Very truly yours, <br />COLEMAN, GLEDHILL, HARGRAVE & PEEK, P.C. <br />eoffr E. Gledhill <br />1sg:1etters\gun,1tr
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.