Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-16-2004
>
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:28:38 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/16/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040316
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
RES-2004-016 Legislative matters-Transition Flexibility in Implementing the mental Health System Reform
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-017 Leg Matters - tax on Impact of Land Development to pay for school capital facilities
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
RES-2004-018 Resolution Regarding Orange County's 2004 Legislative Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />LAW OFFICES <br />COLEMAN, GLEDHILL, HARGRAVE &. PEEK <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />129 E. TRYON STREET <br />P O DRAWER 1529 <br />HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br />919-732-2196 <br />FAX 919.732-7997 <br />N w cgandh com <br />March 4, 2004 <br />Robert L. Gunn, Esquire <br />Gunn & Messick, LLP <br />Post Office Box 880 <br />Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312-0880 <br />RE: Chatham/Orange County Boundary <br />Dear Bob: <br />EXHIBIT B <br />FROM THE DESK OF <br />GEOFFREY E. GLEDHILL <br />E-MAIL g .fu,1dh,11(q N ndh<om <br />This letter follows our recent telephone conversation <br />concerning the Chatham County/Orange County boundary. As I told <br />you during our telephone conversation, Orange County is <br />interested in revisiting the location of the Chatham/orange <br />County boundary, one small segment of the boundary that is <br />illustrated on the maps that are enclosed. One of the maps (I) <br />illustrates the boundary line approved by both the Chatham <br />County and Orange County boards of commissioners in 1989 and <br />identifies the location of the affected parcels. All have been <br />receiving orange County services and paying orange County taxes, <br />thought they were "grandfathered" into the original resolution <br />adopted by the boards of commissioners of both Chatham County <br />and Orange County regarding government services and tax situs <br />and would like their property to be permanently located in <br />Orange County. Another map (II) illustrates the relocation of <br />the Chatham/Orange County boundary to accommodate these <br />properties. The other maps illustrate the "bubbles" already in <br />the boundary approved in 1989. <br />As I indicated to you, it is my understanding that there <br />have been informal meetings of people who live along the <br />boundary and that the properties illustrated are the only ones <br />that are now located south of it whose tax situs is in question. <br />The parcel that is north of the Johnson/Brooke property is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.