Orange County NC Website
Approved &7 - 2023 <br /> 166 Cy Stober: The school ' s adequate facilities public ordinance annual report has a 10 -year forecast using 5 different <br /> 167 models for both the municipal school district and the Orange County School District, none of those models forecast a <br /> 168 capacity concern for the public school system . <br /> 169 <br /> 170 Chris Johnston : Again , I have a lot of things that I ' m considering on my first Orange County Planning Board , and I don ' t <br /> 171 quite know what to think . <br /> 172 <br /> 173 Melissa Poole : With regards to the capacity issue , while the report does show that there is no 10 -year forecast capacity <br /> 174 issue , there is a February 8th article in the Daily Tarheel , where the Deputy Superintendent of Orange County Schools is <br /> 175 quoted as saying " Overcrowding is a concern for the school district as new growth in the area is leading to class sizes <br /> 176 that are exceeding capacity . The district is bringing in mobile units to help with the problem . " The title of the article is <br /> 177 " Orange County Schools Employees Bring Concerns of Overcrowding to Board of Education " so it seems as if there is <br /> 178 some disconnect between the report and what the superintendent and county employees are saying . <br /> 179 <br /> 180 Chris Johnston : To confirm though , the article was an employee saying something and then the report is what we are <br /> 181 supposed to consider. That' s been one of the major things that we keep talking about, is we have to consider what the <br /> 182 actual report says , not what we hear . <br /> 183 <br /> 184 Cy Stober: If I may, there are a couple of relevant things to consider. What the 10-year forecast does not consider is the <br /> 185 condition of the schools or the facilities . It also identifies over capacity of individual schools that could be resolved <br /> 186 through redistricting which the school districts are engaged in at this time . It shows system -wide at the high school , <br /> 187 middle school , and elementary school levels that through redistricting the capacity concerns could be potentially resolved <br /> 188 because it is just looking at the total amount of capacity for the total number of students enrolled . That is not to say that <br /> 189 there are not individual schools that are beyond capacity at this time . <br /> 190 <br /> 191 Melissa Poole : Should we consider capacity at all when a charter school is not districted anyway? <br /> 192 <br /> 193 Cy Stober: I would encourage you to consider whether a school being sited at this location is an appropriate land use as <br /> 194 discussed in our adopted plans and in consideration of the land use in the area . <br /> 195 <br /> 196 Charity Kirk : I like the proposal . I don ' t think it's on the right piece of property . We are talking about the mixed residential <br /> 197 zoning which states that if it is going to be non - residential , it will be an infill arrangement serving more than 50 dwelling <br /> 198 units in a walkable manner. This property is not going to be serving people in a walkable manner. It is a car- oriented <br /> 199 property , especially since the Department of Transportation is not going to be doing sidewalks in the area . It is also going <br /> 200 to be attracting people from around the county . . the tennis and the softball . . . people are going to be driving there . <br /> 201 believe that Orange County needs it . I would like to see this in a more urban environment . I don ' t think this is the right <br /> 202 property for it . Now , is there a right property for it? I don ' t know . I just feel like the interpretation of what mixed residential <br /> 203 is , doesn ' t match with what is planned for the property . <br /> 204 <br /> 205 Lamar Proctor: I ' ve thought a lot about this , I spoke with the chair of the school board , they are not in favor of another <br /> 206 school . They have many repairs that need to be done on the schools . The SAPFO shows that there is capacity for <br /> 207 schools in Orange County over 10 years . I agree with Chris , if this was just the ballfields , it would be a no- brainer and it <br /> 208 would be done . It' s the school . Orange County does not need another school , we need to focus on the schools we have <br /> 209 and making those as good as we can make them . Looking at our Comprehensive Land Use Plan , it encourages us also <br /> 210 to do work with the municipalities in a fair and equitable way . They oppose this , Hillsborough opposes it, they indicated <br /> 211 that it would put an undue burden on their wastewater system . They considered this and opposed and voted against it . <br /> 212 Orange County has to be a good neighbor to its municipalities , the one that is directly affected by this project opposes it, <br /> 213 we do not need another school in Orange County, and that' s pretty much it for me . In our land use plan , we are trying to <br /> 214 encourage expanded use and non - auto modes of travel . I want those ball fields somewhere , as I asked HYAA, there <br /> 215 were over 40 acres cleared in my district in Cheeks that was supposed to be these ball fields and somehow that fell <br /> 216 through . That 40 plus acres was within 2 miles of two 1 .40 exits and was across the street from the soccer fields next to <br /> 217 Gravelly Hill . That would be an ideal place for these ball fields as opposed to jammed into a tight residential area with <br /> 218 creating traffic concerns . I am not talking about traffic concerns from the school because we are not considering those <br /> 219 but traffic concerns for HYAA tournaments , traffic concerns for tennis tournaments , traffic concerns for skate park <br />