Orange County NC Website
18 <br /> 1 recommendation on how to support them. She said she would like to know how other jurisdictions <br /> 2 are managing these facilities. She said that she would like to see an analysis of different <br /> 3 ownership structures. She asked if they could partner with Durham Tech to offer classes in a more <br /> 4 efficient manner. She said she wants to make sure they prevent the runaway board issue and see <br /> 5 the best way to organize the structure. She said that meeting only twice in the last year is not <br /> 6 working. She said a legal review is needed for taxpayers supporting for-profit businesses. She <br /> 7 said they are also in need of a succession plan. <br /> 8 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if they have approved independent audits or if it is new <br /> 9 in the agreement. <br /> 10 Chair Bedford said she is unsure if they are part of the audit. <br /> 11 John Roberts said an audit is optional and would be at the cost of the county. <br /> 12 Commissioner Fowler said she wants to revisit why a Durham County commissioner is on <br /> 13 the board. She said she would like to give Orange County residents some form of priority. She <br /> 14 said she is unsure if it still makes sense to fully subsidize this. <br /> 15 Vice-Chair McKee said this is an incubator just like others they support. He said that he <br /> 16 understands concern over subsidizing a private company, but they also subsidized a private <br /> 17 company for broadband. He said they could make a distinction, but he is unsure there is one. He <br /> 18 said they are helping individuals trying to launch a business. He said this is a specialized industry. <br /> 19 He said the Board prides itself on being leaders in NC and nationally, and the interest shown in <br /> 20 the facility outside of Orange County is national. He said he would be opposed to the county <br /> 21 taking over management. He said this is an organization that needs specialized management. He <br /> 22 said he could support a 1-year extension. <br /> 23 Commissioner Greene said she agrees with Vice-Chair McKee. She said there are other <br /> 24 incubators they support and that fund economic development opportunities for private companies. <br /> 25 She said that this is not just about Orange County. She said that one of her son's friends started <br /> 26 a company and they sell all over the place now. She said that she would support two years but <br /> 27 certainly a 1-year extension. She said they need to have a work session to determine how to keep <br /> 28 this and make it more successful. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 A motion was made by Commissioner Hamilton, seconded by Vice-Chair McKee, to <br /> 31 approve and authorize the Chair to sign the Management Services Agreement renewal for the <br /> 32 Piedmont Food Processing Center for a period of one year. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Vice-Chair McKee added a friendly amendment that this subject will be brought back at a <br /> 35 work session at the discretion of staff and Board leadership. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked how the county has been harmed because they have <br /> 38 only met twice. <br /> 39 Chair Bedford said they don't know. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 42 <br /> 43 James Watts, PFPC Board of Directors Chair, agrees with the Board's concerns and said <br /> 44 these questions have always existed. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 7. Reports <br /> 47 a. 2025 Countywide Property Tax Revaluation Update <br /> 48 The Board received an overview and update from staff on the 2025 revaluation process. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 BACKGROUND: Counties in North Carolina are required to conduct a revaluation of all real <br /> 51 property at least once every eight years. Orange County, like many other counties, has adopted <br />