Orange County NC Website
=22 <br /> management is essential to maintaining designated uses. The critical management objective for <br /> Falls Lake must be to mitigate impacts from existing activities in the watershed and to design and <br /> manage land use changes while continuing to maintain and improve water quality in Falls Lake. <br /> Without reasonable, balanced, and economically supportable actions, the risk of increasing <br /> eutrophication, degradation of water quality, and adverse impacts to designated uses is a real <br /> possibility. <br /> Regulatory and Statutory Requirements for Falls Lake, the UNRBA Response, and the <br /> Limitations of the Current Management Approach <br /> Statutory Requirements and the Rules <br /> In 2005, the NC General Assembly passed Senate Bill 981 requiring the NC EMC to develop a <br /> nutrient management strategy for Falls Lake. The bill also directed the Commission to "consider the <br /> cost of the proposed measures in relation to the effectiveness of the measures. These measures <br /> could include, but are not limited to, buffers, erosion and sedimentation control requirements, post- <br /> construction stormwater management, agricultural nutrient reduction measures,the addition of <br /> nutrient removal treatment processes to point source permitted wastewater treatment plants, the <br /> removal of point source discharging wastewater treatments through regionalization and conversion <br /> to non-discharge treatment technologies, and any other measures that the Commission determines <br /> to be necessary to meet the nutrient reduction goals." <br /> In 2009, Senate Bill 1020 was passed to provide credit for early implementation of practices <br /> installed before the Rules were adopted. This bill also delayed adoption of the Rules from July 1, <br /> 2009, to January 15, 2011, and required that "stormwater management programs to reduce <br /> nutrient loading from new development be implemented no later than 30 months after the Rules <br /> become effective." Additional measures listed for consideration in the nutrient management <br /> strategy were included in this bill: "measures to address nutrient inputs from on-site wastewater <br /> treatment systems, control of atmospheric deposition, allowing the sale and purchase of nutrient <br /> offsets, and allowing trading of nutrient loading allocations and credits for nutrient reductions." The <br /> bill also specified design standards for sedimentation and erosion control for land-disturbing <br /> activities and stated that this section of the bill would not be delayed and would have a start date of <br /> January 1, 2010. These requirements were addressed in the Falls Lake Rules. <br /> To support rules development, DWR used predictive modeling of the watershed and the reservoir to <br /> develop the Falls Lake Rules, which set two stages of nutrient reduction requirements for the lake. <br /> In January 2011, the Falls Lake Rules were adopted by the EMC. The Rules state: <br /> The objective of Stage I is to, at minimum, achieve and maintain nutrient-related water <br /> quality standards[chlorophyll-a criterion]in the Lower Falls Reservoir[downstream of <br /> Highway 50]as soon as possible but no later than January 15, 2021, and to improve water <br /> quality in the Upper Falls Reservoir[upstream of Highway 50]. The objective of Stage II is to <br /> achieve and maintain nutrient-related water quality standards throughout Falls Reservoir. <br /> This is estimated to require a reduction of 40 and 77 percent in average annual mass loads <br /> of nitrogen and phosphorus respectively, delivered from the sources named in Item (6) in the <br /> Upper Falls Watershed from a baseline of 2006. The resulting Stage II allowable loads to <br /> Falls Reservoir from the watersheds of Ellerbe Creek, Eno River, Little River, Flat River, and <br /> Knap of Reeds Creek shall be 658,000 pounds of nitrogen per year and 35,000 pounds of <br /> phosphorus per year. (15A NCAC 02B.0275) <br /> However, both the monitoring and modeling were developed on a compressed time schedule with <br /> limited data. As a result, there is significant uncertainty in the nutrient load reduction targets and <br /> 3 <br />