Orange County NC Website
=14 <br /> physical, biological, and chemical processes of the system will expand the opportunities for <br /> meaningful change. A triple-bottom line approach that considers environmental benefits, costs, and <br /> impacts to citizens must be an integral aspect of developing the revised strategy. The tools and <br /> models built by the UNRBA predict how management actions in the watershed affect nutrient loading <br /> to, and water quality in, Falls Lake. The UNRBA is also conducting economic analyses that consider <br /> capital, maintenance, and operational costs of nutrient management activities. By focusing on the <br /> whole watershed and local implementation, the proposed strategy aims to improve water quality <br /> across the watershed and not prioritize activities solely based on the reduction of nutrients to Falls <br /> Lake. Projects will result in reductions in nutrient loading through incremental and sustained <br /> progress across the watershed, but may also address other pollutants, long-term watershed <br /> sustainability, etc. This comprehensive approach is needed to provide lasting protection of the lake <br /> and its designated uses. Focusing on watershed health also addresses the sub-impoundments <br /> (e.g., Lake Michie, Little River Reservoir, Lake Orange, Lake Buter, etc.) used for water supply within <br /> the basin. Allowing investments throughout the watershed will positively impact water quality across <br /> the basin. <br /> Because of the holistic nature of the recommendations, the UNRBA also recommends that its <br /> implementation for non-point sources be considered by the State as addressing all waterbodies in <br /> the watershed that are currently listed, or may be in the future, on the State's 303(d) list of waters <br /> for pollutants related to nutrients. These other waters may be considered Category 5 waters in <br /> future Integrated Reports if additional point source controls are required. <br /> Create an adaptive program with scheduled assessments and reevaluation. The UNRBA <br /> recommends that the rules exclude the specifics of the program because it will be extremely difficult <br /> to adapt to new information and conditions. Rather,the UNRBA recommends development of an <br /> approved program document referenced by the rules with specific assessment, renewal, and <br /> reevaluation periods. The UNRBA recommends the revised strategy include a formal review period to <br /> evaluate how well the program is working in terms of water quality, necessary changes, and evolving <br /> technologies. The UNRBA proposes a full evaluation in 25 years following the date the revised rules <br /> are readopted with interim evaluations every five years. Interim evaluations and reporting years can <br /> address concerns or changes that occur <br /> during the 25-year period and assist with <br /> tracking trends and accomplishments <br /> over the longer 25-year period. As with The UNRBA recommends that the rules exclude <br /> the IAIA, annual reports are the specifics of the program because it will be <br /> recommended to track implementation extremely difficult to use adaptive management <br /> and compliance with annual investment provisions. Rather, the UNRBA recommends <br /> commitments. It is in the interest of the development of an approved program document <br /> state and the citizens of the watershed referenced by the rules. <br /> that these assessments be done in <br /> partnership with DWR. <br /> Cooperate and collaborate with stakeholders - The UNRBA has worked very closely with its members <br /> and external partners since the re-examination process began. Extraordinary access and <br /> participation by all stakeholders have been promoted by the UNRBA, and transparency has been an <br /> important theme in sharing the work and status of the re-examination effort. Internal and external <br /> stakeholders are invited to provide comments during monthly status meetings. The UNRBA has <br /> hosted several Technical Stakeholder Workshops, Regulatory Forums, or joint Symposia with the NC <br /> Collaboratory to hear and incorporate feedback in the process. The UNRBA has worked closely with <br /> researchers,third-party model reviewers, and DWR modeling staff to review and vet the watershed <br /> and lake models. The UNRBA also worked with DWR, representatives of agriculture, environmental <br /> groups, and land conservation organizations to expand the list of practices with state-approved <br /> v <br />