|
Approved 10.18.2023
<br /> 1 Beth Bronson: Thank you. And I guess this is, could be engineer or conceptual related, but I didn't see any indication of
<br /> 2 a fence, any indication of, besides the signage on the northeast and the southeast side, having signage, or not just
<br /> 3 having signage, no fencing at all. Nothing, no delineation between property barriers, I guess. Is that correct?
<br /> 4
<br /> 5 Ryan Moffitt: I can be corrected, but in all the conversations we've had, that hasn't been contemplated, and based on
<br /> 6 my understanding, that's because we want to leave as much of what's there as undisturbed as possible. And, you
<br /> 7 know, so we don't have to clear to put fence in. We're not, we'd rather not clear to put fence in.
<br /> 8
<br /> 9 Bobby Tucker: Chain-link fence OWASA.
<br /> 10
<br /> 11 Ryan Moffitt: OWASA is fenced along
<br /> 12
<br /> 13 Beth Bronson: OWASA does have fencing?
<br /> 14
<br /> 15 Ryan Moffitt: Yeah.
<br /> 16
<br /> 17 Beth Bronson: Existing already?
<br /> 18
<br /> 19 Ryan Moffitt: Yeah.
<br /> 20
<br /> 21 Beth Bronson: And they have no trespassing, I'm sure.
<br /> 22
<br /> 23 Ryan Moffitt: Yeah.
<br /> 24
<br /> 25 Beth Bronson: Or entranceways. But, yeah, there's no talk of extending a fence down to that corner where OWASA,
<br /> 26 Pluck Farm, and your property conjoin? Like in that area, I guess, would be my only concern of safety wise of having,
<br /> 27 you know, if you're going to have people coming and staying there, you know, one night at a time, versus people who
<br /> 28 know the property very well, you know, wanting to make sure that, I guess, safety, safety wise that you don't have
<br /> 29 people wandering around into the reservoir or wandering back and forth between the business and the camp. So I just
<br /> 30 didn't know if that had been discussed or not or if, like, insurance on either, like, considered.
<br /> 31
<br /> 32 Rebecca Sorenson: A little bit, but I guess. I did go over and meet with Johnny and the crew over at OWASA and the
<br /> 33 conversation that came up was that we could talk more about fencing as we get further along in development. He also
<br /> 34 said that the largest population of trespassers that come into the Cane Creek Reservoir are not people from Pluck Farm
<br /> 35 or, they're all, like, people who live there who always are, like, oh, but I live here. And he's like, yes, but it's still a
<br /> 36 private reservoir. And so, a fence on our property at that, in that conversation, isn't going to keep people who live on
<br /> 37 the other side of it out of Cane Creek Reservoir. So, it's something that we want to think about. Because of the
<br /> 38 population that we're serving, we want to make sure that there is, like, a parameter that's maybe visual for them to see.
<br /> 39 We just haven't gotten that far into the conversation yet.
<br /> 40
<br /> 41 Beth Bronson: Agreed.
<br /> 42
<br /> 43 Beth Bronson: And, yeah, and I agree, you know, not disturbing, you know, the existing foliage might help with having a
<br /> 44 natural fenced in area.
<br /> 45
<br /> 46 Rebecca Sorenson: That's what we would love to see.
<br /> 47
<br /> 48 Beth Bronson: But if you are going those 400 feet right there encroaching in that 30-foot setback, you are going to come
<br /> 49 up against a way to go directly from one property to the next. That's just a consideration I was thinking about.
<br /> 50
<br /> 32
<br />
|