Browse
Search
Agenda 10-17-23; 4-a - Orange County Arts Commission 2023-24 Annual Grant Recipients
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2023
>
Agenda - 10-17-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 10-17-23; 4-a - Orange County Arts Commission 2023-24 Annual Grant Recipients
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2023 12:08:24 PM
Creation date
10/12/2023 12:08:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for October 17, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 10-17-2023 Business Meeting
Minutes-10-17-2023-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2023
ORD-2023-039-Fiscal year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #2
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-067-Resolution Authorizing Sale of Property for the Sheriff’s Office
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> The OCAC grant review and awards process is as follows: <br /> 1. The grant application process is open for two months. Two virtual training sessions <br /> occurred and the OCAC director was available for one-on-one meetings. <br /> 2. After the due date, OCAC staff conducts an initial compliance and eligibility review. <br /> Applications found noncompliant or outside of the grant requirements are considered <br /> disqualified. Eligible organizations are given a compliance score based on prior year <br /> adherence to grant requirements such as logo usage and reporting. <br /> 3. Qualified applications are forwarded to members of each review panel for initial review and <br /> scoring. This year's grant panels included the following: <br /> a. Visual Arts: Composed of OCAC Board Members with visual arts expertise, as well <br /> as one visual arts professional from the community. <br /> b. Performing Arts: Composed of OCAC Board Members with performing arts <br /> expertise, as well as one performing arts professional from the community. <br /> c. Literary Arts: Composed of OCAC Board Members with literary arts expertise. <br /> 4. Non-governmental Grassroots Arts Program (GAP) applicants are also evaluated by a <br /> Financial Review Panel who examine submitted financial documents to determine financial <br /> solvency and stability. <br /> 5. Each panel met virtually to evaluate assigned applications. Feedback, first strengths and <br /> then challenges, was offered by panelists and recorded by OCAC staff. After discussion, <br /> each panelist submitted a score through the online platform for each of the categories <br /> below. After all scores were submitted, the Director recorded the final score per applicant. <br /> 6. The scoring rubric for this year's grant program was as follows: <br /> GRASSROOTS ARTS PROGRAM - ORGANIZATIONS <br /> Artistic Merit — 30% <br /> Community Impact — 25% <br /> Program Management — 15% <br /> Financial Review— 10% <br /> NC Arts Council Priority of Funding — 10% <br /> Compliance score (prior grantees only) — 10% <br /> GRASSROOTS ARTS PROGRAM - SCHOOLS <br /> Artistic Merit — 40% <br /> Integration in curriculum/enrichment— 40% <br /> Free and Reduced Lunch Percentage — 20% <br /> ARTIST PROJECT GRANTS <br /> Artistic Merit — 40% <br /> Community Impact— 30% <br /> Program Management — 20% <br /> Compliance score (prior grantees only) — 10% <br /> 7. Funding decisions were made at the September 2023 OCAC meeting. For the GAP <br /> program, the board prioritized high scoring program requests, programs hiring multicultural <br /> artists, and schools. For APG, the board approved funding applicants with scores above <br /> 60 at their full request amount. <br /> 8. All applicants were notified of the panel's decisions. All declined GAP applicants received <br /> panel feedback; and approved GAP and APG applicants could receive feedback upon <br /> request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.