Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-07-2005-5f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 09-07-2005
>
Agenda - 09-07-2005-5f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:00:04 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:39:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050907
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />Current prospect <br />This consultation grant will underwrite coalescing one regional node in the <br />projected matrix of nodes. It will bring to bear technical experts, like: <br />archaeologists, land grant researchers, specialized landscape architects, <br />regional planners and historians needed to assess each of several sites in a <br />regional heritage matrix. These consultants will authenticate local sites and <br />prepare preliminary interpretations and thus make the final product more <br />understandable at the local and county levels. The end product will be a clear <br />picture of exploitable Trading Path related sites in a three county area in North <br />Carolina and will recommend a framework for planning a three county tourism <br />consortium. It is believed that success in this case will offer inducement to other, <br />similar counties and towns to protect and develop their Contact Era landscapes <br />and archaeological sites. <br />Heritage tourism provides a rationale for protecting antiquities. And heritage <br />tourism works best regionally, not locally. There are precious few Williamsburgs; <br />dense concentrations of artifacts. Most counties and towns have but a handful of <br />attractive sites, but joint venturing with neighboring counties will multiply the <br />value of the heritage assets of all involved counties and towns. The TPA wants <br />to develop a scope and prospect statement for three counties and two <br />municipalities in NC; Orange, Durham, and Person counties and the towns of <br />Chapel Fill] and Durham.. All these entities will be beneficiaries of a coordinated <br />tourism development program. All have considerable unprotected and largely <br />unnoted Contact Era and Trading Path assets. <br />Specific elements of the project <br />Durham City and County <br />In Durham County and in cooperation with the NC historic site at Stagville and <br />with the US Army Corps of Engineers, the TPA will reinterpret the Stagville state <br />historic site to incorporate its pre-Stagville history as a crucial ford along the 17th <br />and 18th century Trading Path. <br />Stagville, an existing tourism site, exists where it is because of the Flat River <br />crossings it exploited. Yet that aspect remains unnoted in the sites interpretation. <br />So, in a sense, one product of this proposed project will be a broadened <br />reinterpretation of an existing heritage site. Preliminary studies have located a <br />packhorse ford and two 18th-century bridge sites heretofore unnoted at Stagville. <br />These revealed remnant roadbeds indicating the complex of transportation <br />options concentrated at this Flat River crossing. It is quite likely that further study <br />will reveal the presence at or near the Stagville stream crossings of a Contact <br />Era Native American or blended Contact Era village site as well. <br />Page 2 of '4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.