Browse
Search
Agenda 09-19-23; 6-a - Orange County NC 54 Multimodal Corridor Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2023
>
Agenda - 09-19-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 09-19-23; 6-a - Orange County NC 54 Multimodal Corridor Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:36:44 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:41:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/19/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for September 19, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 09-19-2023 Business Meeting
Minutes-09-19-2023-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2023
OTHER-2023-061-Sidewalk maintenance agreement
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-063-FY 2024 Local share certification for funding
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-064-Unified grant application FY 2025 Local share certification for funding
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
RES-2023-058-Public transporation program resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-059-Orange County Transportation Priorities – Amended Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MPO Board 10/9/2019 Item 8 <br /> Ref: 38587.01 <br /> October 1, 2019 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Observations <br /> • About 17% of daily traffic on NC 54 just east of Orange Grove Road enters/exits NC 54 between this location <br /> and just west of Old Fayetteville Road. <br /> • During the AM peak, only 9%of traffic on NC 54 just east of Orange Grove Road enters/exits NC 54 between <br /> this location and just west of Old Fayetteville Road.This is consistent with a higher proportion of longer <br /> commuter trips. <br /> • For West Main Street daily traffic, about 12%of traffic enters/exits NC 54 between this just west of Old <br /> Fayetteville Road and just east of Orange Grove Road. For NC 54 Bypass traffic, this figure is about 11%. <br /> • Trips using West Main Street tend to be more local that trips using NC 54 Bypass. <br /> TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS <br /> The NC 54 West corridor study area spans two regional travel demand models. The portion west of the Alamance <br /> County line is represented in the Piedmont Triad Regional Model (PTRM), while the Orange County portion to the <br /> east is part of the Triangle Regional model (TRM v6). <br /> Growth Forecasts <br /> Traffic growth in both models is derived from forecasts of population and employment growth and characteristics, <br /> geographically distributed by traffic analysis zone. Figures 10a-10c and 11a-11c depict TRM and PTRM assumptions <br /> about the distribution and growth of population and employment relative to the NC 54 West study area and the <br /> three travelsheds presented previously. <br /> Because population and employment data available for the two models have different base and design years, values <br /> were extrapolated to obtain consistent values for 2017 and 2045. Also, dot-density plots were used to more <br /> effectively represent the density, magnitude, and distribution of population and employment among traffic analysis <br /> zones (TAZs). Note that each dot represents a number of data points (100 persons; 50 jobs). Dots are randomly <br /> located within each TAZ, and do not represent specific locations. <br /> The socio-economic forecasts in both models were approved and adopted by relevant MPOs and RPOs for use in <br /> transportation planning. Consultation with Alamance and Orange County planning staff did not identify any <br /> problems with the growth assumed in either the TRM and PTRM. <br /> Observations <br /> • Development remains sparse along the middle segment of the corridor, due in large part to environmental <br /> constraints. <br /> • Relative growth is greatest in the western portion of the corridor, both in Alamance County and Mebane, <br /> especially along and west of NC 119. Development includes residential, industrial, and commercial, as well <br /> as newly-approved high school at the corner of NC 54 and NC 119. <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.