Browse
Search
Agenda 09-19-23; 6-a - Orange County NC 54 Multimodal Corridor Study
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2023
>
Agenda - 09-19-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 09-19-23; 6-a - Orange County NC 54 Multimodal Corridor Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:36:44 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:41:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/19/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for September 19, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 09-19-2023 Business Meeting
Minutes-09-19-2023-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2023
OTHER-2023-061-Sidewalk maintenance agreement
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-063-FY 2024 Local share certification for funding
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-064-Unified grant application FY 2025 Local share certification for funding
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
RES-2023-058-Public transporation program resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-059-Orange County Transportation Priorities – Amended Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
43 <br /> APPROVED MINUTES EXCERPT <br /> 90 Nish: Yes, that is why NCDOT has changed their process and working better to accommodate all modes, <br /> 91 including bike/ped, transit, and others, not just the car. <br /> 92 <br /> 93 Randy Marshall: Did these other similar corridors include bike/Ped? <br /> 94 <br /> 95 Nish: Yes <br /> 96 <br /> 97 Nish concluded the presentation with staff requesting OUTBoard recommend BOCC approve the study <br /> 98 and continue coordination and collaborating with all its partners along the entire corridor. The TAS met <br /> 99 last Friday and recommended approval. <br /> 100 <br /> 101 Art Minus: Would like the corridor to stay rural. <br /> 102 <br /> 103 Amy Cole: Thank you for the detail presentation, it is good to see that bike/ped and transit were <br /> 104 included in the study. <br /> 105 <br /> 106 Randy Marshall: yes, the area is going to grow and traffic will increase. We need to think of the bigger <br /> 107 picture and make sure everyone is safe getting to their destination. <br /> 108 <br /> 109 Art Minus: I'm still opposed to the widening but do understand the need to address the problems along <br /> 110 the corridor. We should not always be accommodating cars. <br /> 111 <br /> 112 Randy Marshall: Understand why we shouldn't widen roads but growth will continue. <br /> 113 <br /> 114 Michael Hughes: I see why we should not widen roads but some areas, carefully studies like these, need <br /> 115 a comprehensive improvement this. <br /> 116 <br /> 117 Motion: Randy Marshall Second: Michael Hughes <br /> 118 Dissent: Art Minus <br /> 119 Vote: 4-1 for Approval <br /> 120 <br /> 121 Nish: When I present this to BOCC, I will present the full discussion including the dissent <br /> 122 <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.