Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-21-2002 - 8b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 05-21-2002
>
Agenda - 05-21-2002 - 8b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2017 11:20:54 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:38:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020521
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> needed to be conveyed to the public. The administration recommends that Poe proposed <br /> amendment be referred N the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned tp the <br /> Board of County Commissioners no sooner Nan May 21,2002. <br /> Public Common[ <br /> Pierre Morin,the petitioner,said that he was one of four builders in Crunch <br /> Grave subdivision. He said that It was a little difficult to compem without showing new <br /> homebuyere the differences in each of their products. He said that a 2'x2'sign was not <br /> sufficient because most homebuyers w0uld see theft t house and assume Mat I was the only <br /> builder In the subdivision. He said that 16 square feet might be lager, but it is net as large as <br /> Me Parade of Homes signs,which are 36'x36'. He said Net he wealud showing to new <br /> homebuyere their product as compared to other Will produ on. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Carey,asserted by Commiwloner <br /> Gordon to rotor the proposed amendment to the Planning Boat for a rewmmendafion to be <br /> returned m the Boat of Carl Commissioners no sooner Nan May 21,2002. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 2. Orange County Herat Mitigation Plan <br /> Craig goal said that this Rem is in response ter new legislation that was put <br /> Into effect In June 2001, also known as Senate BIII 300. It was an ad to amend the laws <br /> regarding emergency management as recognized by the legislation because of some tithe <br /> recent Measure in North Caroline such as flooding. In response to the legislative act.there was <br /> a strong suggestion that any local government that would like to 6e in line for assistance In rase <br /> ntfuture ima l disasters should orthogonal a hazard mitgation plan. If to®I governments ere <br /> someone!in assistance funds, it is a requirement that they adopt a plan prior to August of this <br /> year. The purpose dihls and is to explain what a hazard mitigation plan Includes. There was <br /> a PowerPoiint presentation. <br /> Orange County worked with Greensboro and the Emergency Management <br /> Division of North Carolina to develop this plan. The goal is to make residenws and businesses <br /> less vulnerable to Impacts and have a ocotinated approach through discussion between local <br /> governmem6. Hurricanes,tornadoes, lightning, and snowstorms are some of Me Measure that <br /> have hit North Carolina in the peat hew years. Another part of We mMgatlon strategy Is to <br /> identify the junkyards and automobile establishments that are in the way of floating because oil <br /> and other liquids fiom the cars can get caught up In the heading and pause further damage <br /> downstream. Part of the requirement in the Senate till is Oat Me plan should be very strong in <br /> the Planning aspect. Emergency Management Is an up tram participant, but the state wanted <br /> the focus to be on planning to prevent structures from going Into the fioodplain or being placed <br /> inhazardousareas. EMS typically comes in the reactive stage so the state wants planning to <br /> be productive to guide this In Me areas of building,planning and erosion central There has been <br /> some development along recapture in the past,and this needs to be identified This draft plan <br /> will be transmitted to the some for comment. The comments will come back and the final plan <br /> can be submitted. Part of the requirement of the plan is to do training with the community. <br /> Commissioner Brawn asked Rthere were any counties in the east Mat were rim <br /> participating. Craig Benedict saitl that about 90%or the counties In Me east were partltlpatng. <br /> There are a few counties in the coastal areas that have nth put it together. Some communities <br /> do not have the adllty, between their existing departments or staff,to pd it together. <br /> The proposed action for this meeting is that we continue getting input from the <br /> local governments In preparing the plan and bring back a transmi el version of the hazard <br /> mitigation plan to the County Commissioners prior to June 1°. The style will sank back their <br /> comments In order for the County to send the plan back to Me state by August V'. There is no <br /> financial impact at this time <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.