Orange County NC Website
j <br /> I <br /> III <br /> i <br /> l <br /> i <br /> Juvenile Crime Prevention Council Funding Decisions Summary <br /> Juvenile Community ❑ 2-year Funding approved for FY and OR ® 1 -year Funding approved for FY2023-24 <br /> Service and Restitution <br /> Rationale for 2-year Funding approval: ❑ Funded in past years ❑ In good standing with county/JCPC and DPS (following PA, timely reports, reporting to JCPC as <br /> (Volunteers for Youth, requested) ❑ Favorable JCPC monitoring ❑ In compliance with Consultant Monitoring ❑ Quality of Service Assessment (QOS) rating is min 70% (min. score of 14) OR <br /> Inc . ) progress made on PEP in QOS . ❑ Provides an essential dispositional option, explain: <br /> ❑ Meets target population as described in Program Agreement (mmtberserved, and described target population), with minimal exceptions (i.e. less than 10% variance) <br /> ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient ® Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ® Has evaluation <br /> component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohoUcontrolled substances ® Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation <br /> ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ® Other Provides a diversion opition for law enforcement for youth to perform community service hours. <br /> Other <br /> Teen Court (Volunteers ❑ 2-Year Funding approved for FY and OR ® 1 -year Funding approved for FY2023-24 <br /> for Youth, Inc . ) <br /> Rationale for 2-year Funding approval: ❑ Funded in past years ❑ In good standing with county/JCPC and DPS (following PA, timely reports, reporting to JCPC as <br /> requested) ❑ Favorable JCPC monitoring ❑ In compliance with Consultant Monitoring ❑ Quality of Service Assessment (QOS) rating is min 70% (min. score of 14) OR <br /> progress made on PEP in QOS . ❑ Provides an essential dispositional option, explain: <br /> ❑ Meets target population as described in Program Agreement (nianber served, and described target population), with minimal exceptions (i.e. less than 10% variance) <br /> ® Meets funding priority ® Compatible with research ® Cost efficient ® Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ® Has evaluation ' <br /> component El Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ® Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation <br /> ® Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ® Other Provides a diverstion option for court services and law enforcement. Other <br /> ❑ 2-year Funding approved for FY and OR ❑ 1 -year Funding approved for FY <br /> Rationale for 2-year Funding approval: ❑ Funded in past years ❑ In good standing with county/JCPC and DPS (following PA, timely reports, reporting to JCPC as <br /> requested) ❑ Favorable JCPC monitoring ❑ In compliance with Consultant Monitoring ❑ Quality of Service Assessment (QOS) rating is min 70% (min. score of 14) OR <br /> progress made on PEP in QOS . ❑ Provides an essential dispositional option, explain: <br /> ❑ Meets target population as described in Program Agreement (number served, and described target population), with minimal exceptions (i.e. less than 10% variance) <br /> ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation <br /> component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation <br /> ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Other Other <br /> ❑ 2-year Funding approved for FY and OR ❑ 1 -year Funding approved for FY <br /> i <br /> Rationale for 2-year Funding approval: ❑ Funded in past years ❑ In good standing with county/JCPC and DPS (following PA, timely reports, reporting to JCPC as <br /> requested) ❑ Favorable JCPC monitoring ❑ In compliance with Consultant Monitoring ❑ Quality of Service Assessment (QOS) rating is min 70% (min. score of 14) OR <br /> progress made on PEP in QOS . ❑ Provides an essential dispositional option, explain: <br /> ❑ Meets target population as described in Program Agreement (raanber served, and described target population), with minimal exceptions (i.e. less than 10% variance) <br /> ❑ Meets funding priority ❑ Compatible with research ❑ Cost efficient ❑ Addresses reductions of complaints, violations of supervision & convictions ❑ Has evaluation <br /> component ❑ Addresses parental accountability ❑ Addresses use of alcohol/controlled substances ❑ Addresses restitution to victims ❑ Addresses gang participation <br /> ❑ Would increase funding to this service if funds were available ❑ Other Other <br /> November 2 , 2020 <br /> i <br /> i <br />