Browse
Search
Minutes-05-11-2023-Budget Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2023
>
Minutes-05-11-2023-Budget Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2023 11:01:58 AM
Creation date
6/21/2023 10:59:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/11/2023
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
1 & 2 - FY 2023-24 Budget Work Session – Discussion Regarding Outside Agencies, Durham Technical Community College, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and Orange County Schools
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 05-11-2023 Budget Work Session
Agenda for May 11, 2023 Budget Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 05-11-2023 Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> Chair Bedford said she thought that 5 or 6 years ago Orange County was the only <br /> county funding charter schools, but now some other counties are doing the same. <br /> Travis Myren said yes, and he was able to find that Wake County changed its policy in <br /> 2018. <br /> Chair Bedford said it's not required for the county to provide the per pupil allocation for <br /> charter school students, but it's important to do because they are also Orange County students. <br /> Travis Myren said it is also important because otherwise the school system's current <br /> expense budget would have to be used to fund the charter students, and then the per pupil <br /> allocation for traditional public school students would drop significantly. <br /> Vice-Chair McKee asked if counties are required to fund charter students. <br /> Chair Bedford said no, but the school districts are required to pass along the per pupil <br /> allocation for each charter school student. She said years ago, Orange County recognized that <br /> without including the per pupil funding for charter students in the funding for each school <br /> district, the per pupil amount for traditional public school students would drop. <br /> Vice-Chair McKee asked in a scenario where a school system has 1000 students and <br /> 100 went to charter schools, how many of those students does a county have to fund. <br /> Chair Bedford and Travis Myren said 900 students. <br /> Vice-Chair McKee said he doesn't want the implication to be that some other counties <br /> are not funding charter students, when the funding is still from the county's allocation of funding <br /> to the school system. <br /> Travis Myren reiterated that the amount that Orange County provides to school districts <br /> as part of their current expense budgets includes the amount the school districts then have to <br /> provide to the charter schools. <br /> Commissioner Fowler said she read it is state law that the two districts have to be <br /> funded the way they are for operating expenses, but not capital expenses. She asked if it <br /> makes sense to split the capital funding based on the percentage of budgeted students when <br /> the charter school students included in this number are not in the traditional public school <br /> buildings and the school districts do not have to pass capital money onto charter schools. <br /> Travis Myren said the Board has chosen to do it that way in the past, but it doesn't have <br /> to be done that way. <br /> Chair Bedford said initially there weren't very many charter students and the argument <br /> was that even if 25 students left, buildings still have a lot of fixed costs, so it made sense to do <br /> it this way. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton said part of the work of the Capital Needs Work Group may be <br /> to revisit this concept. She said there are other criteria that can be used to determine the best <br /> use of capital dollars given the great capital needs in both school districts. <br /> Chair Bedford said it would be politically unfavorable to give all the capital money to one <br /> of the school districts and it would also be hard to get people to vote for a bond if they know <br /> their schools are getting nothing. She said she does agree that the Board should look at what <br /> the consultant recommends and having a plan where the funding may ultimately balance out <br /> over time would be good. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton said part of the Board's job would be to educate the public <br /> about the plan and how the funding decisions are being made. <br /> Commissioner Fowler said she thinks this should be discussed at some point, and it's <br /> great for the Capital Needs Work Group to make a recommendation. <br /> Vice-Chair McKee said at some point, state law may change and the county may be <br /> required to fund capital expenses for charter schools. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.