Browse
Search
Agenda Materials for June 22, 2023 Schools Safety Task Force Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Schools Safety Task Force
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
Agenda Materials for June 22, 2023 Schools Safety Task Force Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2023 10:50:53 AM
Creation date
6/16/2023 10:50:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/22/2023
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
FINAL June 22, 2023 Schools Safety Task Force Meeting Summary
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive\Schools Safety Task Force\Meeting Summaries\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> safety to school faculty, staff, law enforcement, youth-serving community agencies, <br /> juvenile justice officials, policymakers, parents/guardians, and students. The Center <br /> promotes safe learning environments for N.C. K-12 with a focus on prevention and <br /> mitigation as well as response and recovery in school safety events. Ms. Fairley <br /> discussed Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) and use of <br /> demarcation of school property, windows and lighting, natural surveillance and <br /> landscaping to promote safety. She also reviewed several programs for safety under <br /> statute that promote safety and planning, including annual updating of Vulnerability <br /> Assessments and Comprehensive Safety Plans, development of Anonymous <br /> Reporting Systems, and four phases of emergency management (State Emergency <br /> Response Application (SERA) and School Risk Management Plans (SRMP)). <br /> Ms. Fairley emphasized the importance and statutory requirement (NCGS <br /> 115C.105.49) of consistent annual drills, including reunification plans and <br /> communication with parents, and the need for physical security audits. Limited <br /> funding is available through the Center for SRO's whom she defined as helping <br /> provide safe learning environments, resources for staff, positive relationships with <br /> youth, and strategies to resolve problems affecting youth and protecting all students. <br /> She advised that SROs should not be seen as an enforcement arm of the school <br /> system. <br /> For its April 27, 2023, meeting, the Task Force invited speakers John Roberts, <br /> County Attorney for Orange County Board of Commissioners, and UNC Law <br /> School Professor, Mary-Rose Papandrea, who is considered an expert on the First <br /> Amendment and the Constitution and currently teaches a course specifically on <br /> education and constitutional law. Mr. Roberts provided an overview of laws <br /> impacting conduct at schools by students, parents and others. He briefly discussed <br /> prohibition of weapons on school property and effects of conceal carry laws, the <br /> legal provisions of NCGS 36A about creating a public disturbance that may disrupt <br /> a school, and the meaning of"disorderly conduct" as used in the statute. Part of his <br /> review and questions from members focused on protests and other activities that <br /> might occur on the public roadway adjoining a school property, including sidewalks, <br /> right of ways, and school property in right of ways. <br /> Professor Papandrea noted by way of background that some categories of expressive <br /> activities have either no or limited First Amendment protection. These include <br /> knowingly defamatory statements, true threats intending to communicate an intent <br /> to commit an act of violence, and incitement which encompasses statements that are <br /> directed to inciting immediate unlawful activity. She shared that there is no category <br /> of unprotected speech called "hate speech", and government generally has no power <br /> to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.