Orange County NC Website
population and economy with future uses, recreation and schools. So those two items seem to be in conflict with each 1594 <br />other. We really as a board have not talked very much about if this will preserve the community and rural character of 1595 <br />this parcel or this neighborhood. We have heard a lot about desirable schools, desirable recreation activities, perhaps as 1596 <br />a board we need to spend some time talking about preserving community and rural character. 1597 <br /> 1598 <br />Melissa Poole: One of the options is to give extended time to consider…. 1599 <br /> 1600 <br />Adam Beeman: What do you want to achieve with the extended time? 1601 <br /> 1602 <br />Charity Kirk: We obviously need to discuss more or throw up another vote…is anyone changing their vote? 1603 <br /> 1604 <br />Statler Gilfillen: I am very close as the Eno River representative to changing my vote as these people are my neighbors 1605 <br />and live around me. I live on the old Jackson Farm site and if someone were to come in on the 40-50 acres with this 1606 <br />development right next to my house, the old farmhouse on St. Mary’s, I would be very concerned. I am hearing a lot of 1607 <br />serious issues from these people. I also have a great deal of respect for Jim Parker and what he has done and is trying 1608 <br />to do. So I have mixed feelings about it and I have been right on that edge. Up until tonight when I couldn’t think of a 1609 <br />reason not to. What you just commented about the rural atmosphere, it affects all of us. What is the nature of our 1610 <br />community, you are putting a large block of property and are completely surrounded by neighbors. That was part of why I 1611 <br />was asking Mr. Parker earlier about the question of if you put a school in, is there some sort of compensation. Long term, 1612 <br />that type of solution may increase their property values but that is a hypothetical, so I have mixed feelings. I am not sure 1613 <br />that I should be voting tonight. 1614 <br /> 1615 MOTION BY Beth Bronson to take additional time to review this matter concerning the proposed rezoning Atlas Map 1616 <br />amendment parcel number PIN 9883-19-4355. Seconded by Charity Kirk 1617 <br /> 1618 <br />Adam Beeman: No 1619 <br /> 1620 <br />Chris Johnston: No 1621 <br /> 1622 <br />Lamar Proctor: Yes 1623 <br /> 1624 <br />Beth Bronson: Yes 1625 <br /> 1626 <br />Statler Gilfillen: Yes 1627 <br /> 1628 <br />Melissa Poole: Yes 1629 <br /> 1630 <br />Whitney Watson: Yes 1631 <br /> 1632 <br />Charity Kirk: Yes 1633 <br /> 1634 <br />Steve Kaufmann: Yes 1635 <br /> 1636 <br />Elizabeth Kalies: Yes 1637 <br /> 1638 <br />MOTION PASSED 8-2 1639 <br /> 1640 <br />The next scheduled meeting is May 3, 2023 7:00 pm 1641 <br /> 1642 <br />AGENDA ITEM 4: ADJOURNMENT 1643 <br /> 1644 <br />Meeting was adjourned at 11:10 PM 1645 <br />1646 <br />__________________________________ 1647 <br />Adam Beeman, Chair 1648 <br />34