Orange County NC Website
331 <br />Hollis Chatelain: I support schools, I support athletic fields, I support all of these different sports, but I don’t support them 332 <br />being built here. One of the things that nobody has really mentioned is that the surrounding houses, all around this 333 <br />enormous field, are still on the older wells. On Lawrence Road, there are still people who are still on the older, sixty-foot 334 <br />wells. When we don’t get a whole lot of water, those well have a risk of drying up. This field could take a lot of the water 335 <br />from all of these houses that are on these older wells. A lot of these people are lower income people, who is going to pay 336 <br />for new wells. Nobody seems to be considering that. This is really a big problem. I am just really surprised that nobody 337 <br />has said anything about that. One of the things that they said and the next thing I would like to mention is the traffic. One 338 <br />of the things that they have said is that there were 4,500 cars that went on Lawrence Rd. in February of 2021. This was 339 <br />during lockdown. I live on Lawrence Rd. there are so many more cars when we were not in Covid and now. I do not think 340 <br />it is realistic for one of the only roads that go North/South through Hillsborough. If there were some sort of emergency at 341 <br />the school or somewhere else around there, they could not get emergency vehicles in there. They could not get them to 342 <br />the hospital which is south of there. I am against a facility like this in this spot and I ask that you vote no. 343 <br /> 344 <br />John Dempsey: The owner has already brought a request for rezoning for this parcel to the town of Hillsborough where it 345 <br />was denied. It was found by the Mayor and the Town Board in keeping with Hillsborough’s future land use plans and 346 <br />would not be in the long-term interest of Hillsborough’s businesses and residents. Their decision was informed by a 347 <br />variety of Hillsborough’s town agencies. Being turned down by Hillsborough, the developer has come to Orange County 348 <br />asking for conditional district rezoning for the same plan. You should be aware that if Orange County permits this 349 <br />rezoning, then it will be triggering a recent North Carolina State Law that requires municipalities to provide water and 350 <br />sewer services to charter schools if they have the capacity to do so. The Town of Hillsborough has been formally put on 351 <br />notice by the developer to reserve water and sewer capacity for this development. If you rezone this parcel, then make 352 <br />no doubt about it, at that point, neither Orange County nor the Town of Hillsborough, will have any say in the distribution 353 <br />of Hillsborough’s water and sewer resources to this non-contiguous parcel. They will be forced to do so by state law. As 354 <br />one town board member put it, “this will rip Hillsborough’s Comprehensive Sustainability Plan to shreds.” It should also 355 <br />be noted that if Orange County decides to permit this rezoning request, that it will be breaking the WASMPBA planning 356 <br />and boundary agreement signed by Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County. That agreement 357 <br />….signatories to growth management….resolve and preclude conflicts about future service areas and also provide 358 <br />predictable planning and financing. Rezoning will also result in tax and service fee hikes for Hillsborough businesses and 359 <br />residences over time. Without bringing any new tax revenue to the town regardless of who pays for the initial extension 360 <br />of services, it is alarming to me that these costs to Hillsborough are not mentioned or addressed by the applicant or by 361 <br />the Orange County Planning Department. At the last planning board meeting on April 5, Hillsborough’s mayor and a town 362 <br />board representative, signed up for 3 minutes to address this board on these and other concerning issues with this 363 <br />proposal. Three minutes, for the jurisdiction that would be held responsible for servicing this project, paying for the 364 <br />consequences, and the jurisdiction that should be making these decisions. Please, listen to our town representatives and 365 <br />vote unanimously to not recommend this rezoning proposal to the Orange County Board of Commissioners. 366 <br /> 367 <br />Margo Lakin: I’m for schools and ball fields and tennis courts and pickleball and skateboards and walking, what I’m 368 <br />against is this spot zoning that will disenfranchise Hillsborough voters and compromise our water and sewer capacity. 369 <br />We have been told that rezoning decisions are based on land use, not on traffic patterns, not on who will occupy the 370 <br />development. This rezoning doesn’t promote Hillsborough’s future land use plan. It will rip the town’s comprehensive 371 <br />sustainability plan to shreds. It doesn’t even support Orange County’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan that serves as a 372 <br />guide to county growth and development through 2030. The rezoning will not efficiently use existing capacity, it will 373 <br />create light, noise, and air pollution. I haven’t heard one mention of …ratings for buildings. It will destroy federally 374 <br />recognized habitat for five protected species, it will threaten two watersheds, and compound the stress on the town’s 375 <br />finite water and sewer capacity. There are eight planning principals in the 2030 plan that have been the foundation for 376 <br />development, this proposal meets none of them. We heard that conditional zoning only allows for this project and no 377 <br />variations but according to the planning department presentation, at the April 4 Board of County Commissioners 378 <br />meeting, where another conditional rezoning proposal was voted on, we were told that conditional zoning does allow for 379 <br />negotiation between applicant and staff or appointed board, or the elected body of Orange County. If rezoned, this 380 <br />proposal could change and Hillsborough would not be part of those closed door decisions. We haven’t heard from the K-381 <br />8 charter school proposal because it doesn’t exist. At the neighborhood information meeting, the developer failed to 382 <br />mention that he is also the landowner. He told the room that the sports fields were place holder ideas only. Two weeks 383 <br />ago, we heard for the first time in a public forum , that well and septic can now support this project and Hillsborough 384 <br />Water and Sewer isn’t needed. So why was there an annexation request to Hillsborough in the first place? If rezoning is 385 <br />11