Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-06-2023; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2023
>
Agenda - 06-06-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 06-06-2023; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2023 3:34:09 PM
Creation date
6/1/2023 3:40:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/6/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for June 6, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 06-06-2023 Business Meeting
Minutes-06-06-2023-Business Meeting Con'd
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2023
OTHER-2023-036-Statement of Inconsistency of a Proposed Zoning Atlas Map Amendment with the Adopted Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Other Applicable Adopted Plans
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-037-Contract Amendment – Recreation Factory Partners, Inc. (Sportsplex)
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-038-Application for amendments to the joint planning land use plan future land use map and zoning atlas 2016 Mount Carmel Church road within the Chapel Hill Township
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-039-Revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-040-Offer Letter-Hurricane Florence Hazard Mitigation Property Acquisition Authorization
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
PRO-2023-010-Proclamation recognizing Juneteeth 2023
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-041-Refund-Release Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-042-Refund-Release Resolution
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-043-Opioid advisory committee settlement use recommendation and approval budget amendment 10-B
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-044-Request to Abandon Future Street at Acorn Ridge Trail
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-045-RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR TO EXECUTE A REVISED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
RES-2023-047-Resolution Approving Leases for Mobile Classroom Units for 2023-24 School Year
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br /> 1 Commissioner Greene said she had questions about the widening of NC 54. She said <br /> 2 that the Town of Carrboro is opposed to the changes. She asked why it is still recommended. <br /> 3 Nishith Trivedi said that the OUTBoard and Board of County Commissioners <br /> 4 recommended it to be a county priority because the Phase 2 study was completed and the project <br /> 5 was broken up differently for SPOT 7. He said the breakup of the project in SPOT 5 was the <br /> 6 entire corridor from Old Fayetteville Road to Interstate 40 and NC 119 past Graham. He said in <br /> 7 the SPOT 6 cycle it was broken it up into different parts focusing on the Alamance County and <br /> 8 Burlington Graham MPO submitting their portion from NC 119 to Mebane Oaks Road. He said <br /> 9 that they all approved the study and they are pursuing widening their portion of NC 54. He said <br /> 10 that PART is going to put a park and ride transit route through the corridor because it is a priority <br /> 11 for them. He said Orange County broke it up differently, understanding Carrboro's objection. He <br /> 12 said it remained a county priority because of high safety, crash, and congestion issues. He said <br /> 13 that the Phase 2 study showed that if it is not widened, congestion will spread to other roads and <br /> 14 crashes will continue to happen. He said crashes and safety issues are getting worse, according <br /> 15 to data from the Highway Patrol. He said that the OUTBoard asked to revisit the action on the <br /> 16 study, to review the alternatives that were analyzed. He said that he will be presenting the study <br /> 17 to the Board in May. He said that the project was submitted in SPOT 6 because they wanted to <br /> 18 consider pursuing the improvements along that corridor. He said they will continue to work with <br /> 19 Carrboro to do those improvements. <br /> 20 Commissioner Greene asked how Carrboro's input is being considered. <br /> 21 Nishith Trivedi said that Carrboro unconditionally objects to the entire project, even in the <br /> 22 areas that are not under Carrboro jurisdiction. He said the state also considers the project a <br /> 23 priority, to reduce serious injuries and fatalities. <br /> 24 Chair Bedford said she spoke with Mayor Seils and that part of it was that they did not <br /> 25 know that the project would include bicycle and pedestrian considerations. <br /> 26 Commissioner Fowler asked what multi-modal means. <br /> 27 Nishith Trivedi said that any time there are improvements considered to the road,the entire <br /> 28 right of way has to be considered. <br /> 29 Nishith Trivedi continued the presentation. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Slide #17 <br /> GRANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> NC 54 West Corridor Studer <br /> Update <br /> April 18, 2023 <br /> Berard of County Commissioners <br /> 32 <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.