Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> 1 Slide#7 <br /> Results GUNC <br /> NUre 1.krlFa>.11tiWI AWd RaReS brr RroperlrVailue <br /> 1;si <br /> d <br /> i.7 7 <br /> 3 <br /> er <br /> 1.41 <br /> I no S.Jti <br /> ;79d yIJQ1�30I- I.Dt.TOr- 7'17.041- 7#�:G4.1- <br /> 332A'01- W291-291- ':MAOI- 497m1- 901- <br /> 21UM 242AM 3st-F.+w 312DW 3166230 4313.IN -ILVAM 422$ blvd 60d <br /> Median Neighborhood Waluui#$) <br /> ,kM lsb3 degmvAirsdln Ockiat edsft"N hW+Ihs.rfe irxls.A.pplaiw apneilsilam 71-m 11icri vnrt umusy <br /> ho In M21.41ll "tie gypped Paimftwihow 1mv bons <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Chris McLaughlin said the two high appeal rates in the middle of the above graph are the <br /> 4 result of the concentration of appeals in the Northside neighborhood. He said this is an indication <br /> 5 that the civic involvement increased the appeals and that this is not a negative thing, it is simply <br /> 6 showing higher appeal rates than other areas. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Slide #8 <br /> IN <br /> OL 0 <br /> IMUNC Kr <br /> ReLSUItS <br /> No otherstrong evidelnoe of systemic bias in the appeal process <br /> Property values diel not have consistent impact on appeal result. <br /> • <br /> Minority population percentages did not have consistent impact <br /> on neither <br /> — Appeal rates <br /> — Appeal results <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Chris McLaughlin said that these results are good news. <br /> 11 <br />