Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
54 <br /> 1 Slide #9 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> AW <br /> • Continue communication& collaboration <br /> • Consider opportunities for complimentary services <br /> • Consider joint promotional campaign for library services <br /> • Consider periodic report to Commissioners and Council <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #10 <br /> QUESTIONS? <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Chair Bedford said she read the full report and thanked Susan Brown and the task force <br /> 7 for their efforts. She said that the expense of interoperability did not show a corresponding benefit. <br /> 8 Vice-Chair McKee asked how many Orange County residents who are not in the Town of <br /> 9 Chapel Hill use the Chapel Hill Public Library. <br /> 10 Susan Brown said she would get that number to the Board. <br /> 11 Vice-Chair McKee said he thought that funding for the Chapel Hill Public Library was <br /> 12 contingent on interoperability. He asked if he misunderstood that condition. <br /> 13 Commissioner Fowler said the only thing this would help us with is saving people from <br /> 14 having to sign into two different libraries because everyone now has access to both sets. She <br /> 15 said that making the computers interactive would only save users one sign-in versus two and it <br /> 16 does not change access to what is available. <br /> 17 Vice-Chair McKee said he thought it was stated that the sharing of volumes would result <br /> 18 in increased wait times for Chapel Hill users. <br /> 19 Susan Brown said that could result for any user, she only used that as an example. She <br /> 20 said that the current MOU does not require interoperability. <br />