Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
140 <br /> performance in the surrounding area, and significantly impact the Town's ability to fill and drain tanks in <br /> these zones. <br /> 3. The offsite sewer extension requires installing sewer mains in a currently unserved area.The sewer outfall <br /> from the subject parcel is proposed through a portion of the adjacent neighborhood in existing DOT roads <br /> west of Lawrence Road. Existing residential homes in this neighborhood do not currently have sewer <br /> service, the proposed sewer extension provides frontage to only a portion of these homes.The net effect <br /> of the proposed extension is not equitable for the remaining homes in the community that did not receive <br /> frontage as part of this project.The Town does not have plans to extend sewer to the rest of this <br /> community. <br /> 4. The project proposes a hybrid approach to sewer service on the subject site,with both septic drain fields <br /> and public sewer extensions.The proposed mix of community septic service and public sewer service is <br /> inconsistent with current guidance from Orange County on where septic systems are considered <br /> appropriate. <br /> 5. There are two schools shown on the site plan. At this time,the Town of Hillsborough has only been asked <br /> to reserve capacity for one school-West Triangle Highschool.The town will also not serve a tennis club or <br /> ballfields/irrigation restrooms or concessions. <br /> Stormwater(Heather Fisher 919-296-9622 heather.fisher@hillsboroughnc.gov) <br /> 1. Any conflicts that arise between SCMs and utilities or other components potentially could be addressed <br /> by distributing smaller stormwater control measures throughout the site. Please consider integrating <br /> bioretention into the parking lot landscaping areas and/or the use of rainwater harvesting as SCMs for the <br /> buildings. <br /> 2. The project should analyze the downstream impact on stormwater infrastructure. Is the NCDOT pipe <br /> under Hwy 70 to the north and 1-85 to the south sized adequately to accept the increased flow from this <br /> site should it be developed? <br /> Predevelopment Meeting Agenda 12 of 2 <br />