Browse
Search
5.3.23 PB Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
5.3.23 PB Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2023 3:49:52 PM
Creation date
4/27/2023 3:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/3/2023
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> 252 traded to someone else and now there are motocross bike paths. That was not clarified in any <br /> 253 of the documents. The front of the property became an agribusiness, and they allowed <br /> 254 weddings and concerts which brought a lot of traffic and music. My concern is the 70 acres of <br /> 255 common area. If there aren't good restrictions on that, the surrounding community may suffer. <br /> 256 The developer will have control of the land until it is turned over to the homeowners. The <br /> 257 developer talks about farming on that land, and he could go to the state and get a farming <br /> 258 exemption. This would make him exempt from all kinds of regulations. He could build buildings <br /> 259 without county building codes, he can do wedding venues, he can do music venues. What 1 <br /> 260 would like to recommend is to put a conservation easement on the land and then have someone <br /> 261 else manage it like Triangle Land Conservancy. You could guide them to create the restrictions. <br /> 262 Orange County doesn't have a good track record.... <br /> 263 <br /> 264 John Cates- I'm a neighbor and owner of a farm that has been in my family since the 1700's. <br /> 265 The Snipes and Kirks have been our neighbors for a long time. The farmers in the community <br /> 266 are good stewards of the land. I'm appreciative of the effort they have put into this, to protect the <br /> 267 rural agricultural landscape of the community. I am very much in support of this plan. When 1 <br /> 268 drive through Wake County, and I see the backs of houses along the road on one side and <br /> 269 agricultural land on the other side. I'm thankful that this plan fits with Orange County and the <br /> 270 way we preserve land versus the way other counties around us do it. My hat is off to the <br /> 271 planning board and the job that you are doing. I think that any concerns that the neighbors have <br /> 272 are legitimate concerning conservation. I drink coffee in the morning and watch the sun come up <br /> 273 on the hill where they are going to put the houses. The farmers are great stewards of the land. <br /> 274 They have been caring for the land for a long time and the plan that these generations of <br /> 275 farmers have put into protecting our area is very much appreciated. <br /> 276 <br /> 277 Ben Morgan- Dairyland Road resident, lifelong Orange County resident, I raise livestock on my <br /> 278 property and am also in law enforcement, as well as a firearms instructor and do training and <br /> 279 qualifications on my property. My concern is the noise and disturbance that I will generate for <br /> 280 the development and the other way around, the construction noise. The first time I heard about <br /> 281 this meeting was yesterday. I wish my wife could have come because she loves to speak. I wish <br /> 282 the developers or property owners had met with us about our concerns, I would have loved to <br /> 283 have purchased any amount of buffer area or been provided any sort of buffer from this <br /> 284 development. <br /> 285 <br /> 286 Beth Muirhead- Neighbor &farm owner, I am concerned about one thing, the property, <br /> 287 especially part of the open spaces they've got,joins my property. I raise racehorses and grow <br /> 288 trees. I'm just concerned about the amount of human traffic this is going to be. It looks like if that <br /> 289 open space is right down to my property line, without a privacy fence there, it's going to look like <br /> 290 it is just open because it's busy down there. I've also been cautioned by the attorneys because <br /> 291 there is a lake down there and it is lovely. People do go down and swim down there without <br /> 292 permission. I've just found out that if a child goes down there and drowns in my lake, then I will <br /> 293 be responsible for it and will be the one that gets sued. It is a tremendous amount of concern to <br /> 294 me. I've already accepted that I'm going to have to put padlocks on the fences so that no one <br /> 295 goes in there and gets in trouble, but they can climb over the fence, that's a concern. My horses <br /> 296 are wonderful animals but I'm just concerned about dealing with traffic and I think that some <br /> 297 kind of delineation of the property line.....1 don't think I have the right to tell the Snipes what they <br /> 298 can and can't do with their property, I just want to protect where my property adjoins their <br /> 299 property....I don't want to have to put up "no trespassing or private property" signs, to me that's <br /> 300 not very friendly but I'm told that if I don't do that, it's going to be worse. I would just like for <br /> 301 everybody to be aware that there are other people that are worried about this same thing. <br /> 302 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.