Orange County NC Website
viii. Renee: pinpoint all of the things that are problematic, <br />make a list, and then make a list of what we’re looking <br />for <br />1. If we’re looking for Mebane #s and Mebane isn’t <br />participating, that’s a problem <br />2. Do we continue using our formulas with using a <br />standard 3 bedroom house for generating student <br />#s (is this still accurate) <br />3. Has had issues with SAPFO from day 1 but have <br />learned to live with it <br />4. How do we integrate universal Pre-K #s? <br />5. Can bring up at next BOCC meeting but should <br />put it on the agenda for the next meeting in the <br />fall <br />ix. Patrick: did an analysis a few years ago with Craig and <br />compared actuals with projections based on <br />developments and found that projects are pretty accurate <br />(some developments are underestimated and others are <br />overestimated) <br />1. If we’re looking at a formula, should run at 100% <br />capacity rather than 105% for E, 107% for <br />middle, and 110% for high schools <br />a. Most districts use 100% <br />b. Have to have seats for kids when they <br />show up <br />c. Eric: agrees about using 100% capacity <br />#s <br />x. Carrie: Likes the plan to review this fall but look at <br />specific problems <br />1. Districts can share specific examples of issues <br />such as the Orange High/Cedar Ridge re- <br />districting <br />xi. Jean: What do we do about the older schools in addition <br />to capacity? <br />1. Group has talked about financing, needs of older <br />schools, what new schools can bring, capacity, <br />next month talking about design standards <br />a. What else do we need to talk about that <br />we haven’t addressed to get the full <br />picture that can be put into a report? <br />b. Email Jean with any ideas <br />i. Patrick: safety and security <br />ii. Rani: school needs <br />iii. Bonnie: we don’t have enough <br />money to do what we need to do <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: F3ECCCC4-11C5-4B8B-A148-28FAABFF6334