Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
6 <br /> 1 Slide #6 <br /> Background - NC Process <br /> NODOT <br /> Does not determine how <br /> projects are submitted <br /> ------------• <br /> NCDQT DOT approved schedule,weights_crlterla,process_etc. <br /> Local Mpoi <br /> Gov't -• <br /> Identify <br /> Rpo ■• <br /> Projects * ■• _ * releases <br /> and limitedsubm� provide Draft <br /> submit to - ■ <br /> PJ projects Input <br /> to poin(5 <br /> RPO NCOOT <br /> By Summer Fall Spring- Fall <br /> Spring 2023 2023 to Summer 2024 <br /> 2023 winter 2024 <br /> 2023 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Commissioner Hamilton asked if other states make project decisions this way. <br /> 4 Nishith Trivedi said no. He said they have quantitative measures but there are different <br /> 5 processes. He said the main process of this is to remove politics out of the process and make it <br /> 6 data driven. <br /> 7 Commissioner Richards said it seems that some of the projects that were said to be less <br /> 8 likely to be approved still had a higher crash rate. She said that it seems it's partly quantitative <br /> 9 but other criteria come into effect. <br /> 10 Nishith Trivedi said there are slides coming up that will show the criteria and evaluation. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Slide #7 <br /> Background — MPO/RPO Process <br /> 0C-349G OCHC S TARCO, com"erwye State requhrrnent-Mf'Os#RPOs <br /> Vlsron all future neKplan L <br /> Transpartat3nn Plan Pnrblem statement,gale tioz�de l" <br /> 34+ mar M P4 Rvq&**p 1wire1y-Mpos ontr, <br /> GC-2{@G&4GiC� N14tropolitart i19931 COMtralrlt.piamY <br /> TrmWartation Ptw <br /> SPpr P+loritizatron proms- <br /> -1{e-ers 2ywa --' ��M1� Reiul N it 37tP <br /> 1O•Ytac;}titF <br /> Transportation <br /> ImproM4nWt FundK o•tsign 4 Emlrmmmttl(tiEPA) <br /> Prograrn(MP) feaeral Ap916aal Of rlrst4 yeWt <br /> [First 3 Incas•COMMFrFEa, <br /> Latter S years-devetoproeMal] <br /> 13 <br />