Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-18-2023; 4-a - Property Tax Appeals Bias Study Presentation from UNC School of Government
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2023
>
Agenda - 04-18-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 04-18-2023; 4-a - Property Tax Appeals Bias Study Presentation from UNC School of Government
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 11:17:32 AM
Creation date
4/13/2023 11:26:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/18/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for April 18, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 04-18-2023 Business Meeting
Minutes-04-18-2023-Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2023
OTHER-2023-023-2022 Annual Report for Orange County’s CDBG-CV Grant
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
OTHER-2023-024-Amendment to the Charge for the Schools Safety Task Force
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2023
RES-2023-014-Orange County Transportation priority list for spot 7.0 FY-2026-2035 STIP
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> Orange County Property Tax Appeals:A Systemic Bias Analysis 9 <br /> Conclusion <br /> What do these results mean for the Orange County tax office and its practices going forward? <br /> It may be helpful to put the Study's results in context. Orange County's results were"better" <br /> in some sense than the results of recent similar studies that the School conducted for Durham <br /> County and Mecklenburg County in that the Orange County study found less evidence of <br /> systemic bias 7 <br /> In all three counties,the studies found that appeal rates were generally higher for more <br /> expensive neighborhoods. But in Durham and Mecklenburg counties, appeal rates were also <br /> generally higher for more White neighborhoods.And in Mecklenburg County, appeal results <br /> were also generally higher for neighborhoods that were more expensive and more White. <br /> That said,remember that the Orange County results were affected by an unusually large <br /> number of appeals from taxpayers in and near the Northside neighborhood.Without these <br /> additional appeals,it is possible that the Orange County results would have been more similar to <br /> those from Durham and Mecklenburg counties. <br /> The lower appeal rate among taxpayers who live in less expensive neighborhoods may <br /> contribute to a"property tax assessment gap"that benefits Whiter,wealthier taxpayers.This <br /> assessment gap is the gap between the ratio of tax assessments to sales prices for Black-owned <br /> property versus White-owned property.One national study concluded that the assessment gap <br /> in North Carolina was 11 percent.In other words,Black-owned properties in North Carolina <br /> were assessed about 11 percent higher than White-owned properties relative to their actual sales <br /> prices.This result places North Carolina just below the study's national average assessment gap <br /> of 12.7 percent but in the highest third of all states." <br /> Most appeals produce reductions in assessed values.'If taxpayers living in less expensive <br /> neighborhoods are less likely to appeal their tax appraisals,it follows that the property owned <br /> by those taxpayers on average would be assessed higher relative to market value than property <br /> owned by other taxpayers. <br /> The lower appeal rates for certain groups of taxpayers may occur in part due to a lack of <br /> education and information about the process of appealing property taxes.Additional outreach by <br /> the tax office targeting less White and less expensive neighborhoods might alleviate some of that <br /> information deficit.Taxpayers may be more likely to take advantage of the appeal process if they <br /> learn that the process is free,does not require an attorney,and generally does not involve a home <br /> inspection.While additional appeals of course increase a tax office's workload,they can also <br /> make a mass reappraisal more accurate. <br /> 7.See Chris McLaughlin,"Analyzing Property Tax Appeals for Systemic Bias,"Coates'Canons NC <br /> Local Government Law(blog),October 4,2021,https://canons.sog.unc.edu/2021/10/analyzing-property- <br /> tax-appeals-for-systemic-bias/(Durham study)and Christopher B.McLaughlin,Mecklenburg County <br /> Property Tax Appeals:A Systemic Bias Analysis(July 2022),https://www.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/ <br /> meck_county_appeals_study_final.pdf(Mecklenburg study). <br /> 8.For more about the assessment gap,see Chris McLaughlin,"Systemic Bias and Property Taxes," <br /> Coates'Canons NC Local Government Law(blog),November 23,2020,https://canons.sog.unc.edu/ <br /> systemic-bias-and-property-taxes/. <br /> 9.More than 70 percent of all informal and formal appeals included in the Study resulted in reductions <br /> in assessed values. <br /> ©2023.School of Government.The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. <br /> Use of this publication for commercial purposes or without acknowledgment of its source is prohibited. <br /> Reproducing,distributing,or otherwise making available to a non-purchaser the entire <br /> publication,or a substantial portion of it,without express permission,is prohibited. <br /> For permissions questions or requests,email the School of Government at publications@sog.unc.edu. <br /> Other School reports can be accessed on the Publications page of our website:sog.unc.edu/publications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.