Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> 549 <br /> 550 Taylor Perschau-This is how one of the conditions came about. "Number 4 Resource Protection Area: Recognizing that <br /> 551 the property is within a Resource Protection Area due to its proximity to the White Cross School,the north elevation of <br /> 552 the building towards NC Highway 54, shall consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, trim, crown,frieze, <br /> 553 simulated windows, etc. as proposed for the front elevation in the submitted application;" <br /> 554 That condition was added after Peter Sandbeck was allowed the opportunity to comment, so that was in response. <br /> 555 <br /> 556 Charity Kirk-So did he comment on the addition? <br /> 557 <br /> 558 Taylor Perschau- I don't believe that we were able to get those materials back to him for further comment after the memo <br /> 559 was provided. <br /> 560 <br /> 561 Statler Gilfillen-What you've described there, I don't know that that's compatible with what he's described, could be the <br /> 562 issue here. I just want to raise the question tonight. <br /> 563 <br /> 564 Cy Stober-On that letter,which is on page 205...on page 206,the first paragraph, Mr. Sandbeck states"As a mitigation <br /> 565 strategy we recommend that the design treatment for the front elevation as shown on the sheet A2, be continued around <br /> 566 the corner, and applied also to the north elevation.This should consist of the same treatment of cement fiber, lap siding, <br /> 567 trim, crown,frieze, simulated windows.This modification to the building design will provide a significant visual <br /> 568 improvement to the elevation facing NC 54 and the historic school building." I believe that condition was directly in <br /> 569 response and almost a pull quote from Mr. Sandbeck's language. <br /> 570 <br /> 571 Bob Hornik-After seeing that,we did extend the fagade along the north side of the building in direct response to Mr. <br /> 572 Sandbeck's comment. <br /> 573 <br /> 574 Charity Kirk-Could you touch on the size of the other retail establishments and the sizes of the parking lots in the area <br /> 575 and how this store compares to the sizes of the others? <br /> 576 <br /> 577 Bob Hornik- I'm not sure about the size of the parking lots, I know that across Hwy 54, 1 think the Artisan's Building that <br /> 578 we were just talking about is 8,000 square feet give or take. There's the other building that's almost directly across Hwy <br /> 579 54 from this property where you have the pole barn building,which is significantly less aesthetically pleasing to the <br /> 580 historic school than our site would be but that pole barn is about 7,700 square feet,the building itself. <br /> 581 <br /> 582 Charity Kirk- Is that a retail establishment? <br /> 583 <br /> 584 Bob Hornik- It's just what's across the street, I didn't know you were talking about just retail establishments. <br /> 585 <br /> 586 Charity Kirk- I was asking about retail establishments. <br /> 587 <br /> 588 Bob Hornik- I know the gas station across White Cross Road is, I want to say, 1,500 square feet roughly. I looked at all <br /> 589 those this afternoon and the Bravo Market is about double that, I think. It's 2,500 or something like that. <br /> 590 <br /> 591 Charity Kirk-So a 10,000 square feet retail building would match some other buildings in the area but not necessarily <br /> 592 other retail stores? <br /> 593 <br /> 594 Bob Hornik- I think that's an accurate statement, yes. <br /> 595 <br /> 596 Beth Bronson-I have a question for the applicant. Is anyone here from Kimley Horn? <br /> 597 <br /> 598 Bob Hornik-The traffic engineer?There's nobody here from there tonight. <br /> 599 <br /> 600 Beth Bronson-Is anybody here to speak to the traffic impact analysis that was performed on that intersection? <br /> 601 <br /> 602 Bob Hornik- I'll do the best I can with it, I've reviewed it. <br /> 603 <br />