Browse
Search
4.5.23 PB Packet - Final
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
4.5.23 PB Packet - Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2023 12:09:09 PM
Creation date
4/4/2023 11:29:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2023
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
4.5.23 PB Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> 439 Whitney Watson- If I could follow up on Randy and actually ask Brian a question, that is designated as an Economic <br /> 440 Activity Node, correct? <br /> 441 <br /> 442 Brian Collie- It's a Rural Community Activity Node. <br /> 443 <br /> 444 Whitney Watson- Is there any history of that type of retail store drawing additional commercial activities around them to <br /> 445 enhance that node? <br /> 446 <br /> 447 Brian Collie-As far as that question goes, I don't know if I can answer that,we don't have the studies that lead to that. <br /> 448 <br /> 449 Whitney Watson-What about suppressing additional development in that area because of the competition? <br /> 450 <br /> 451 Brian Collie- I can't answer that either. <br /> 452 <br /> 453 Beth Bronson-There are studies out there if you start poking, but they are usually for more urban areas, not rural areas. <br /> 454 <br /> 455 Cy Stober- If you look at the language in the comprehensive plan, it simply makes recommendations about what the <br /> 456 future land use should be in that area. It doesn't really speak to competition between nonresidential uses, so we are <br /> 457 bound and limited by the guidance provided by the comprehensive plan. <br /> 458 <br /> 459 Beth Bronson-Can you clarify to that point that the comprehensive plan does not necessarily specify NCCD or the NC 2, <br /> 460 but they do specify to local commercial? <br /> 461 <br /> 462 Cy Stober-No, commercial. This was in the slide that Brian already had up. If you look at the last clause, "an appropriate <br /> 463 location for any of the following uses, the institutional uses then the final clauses, one or more commercial uses"that is <br /> 464 the guidance that is provided to us by our comprehensive plan. Imperfect as it may be, that is the guidance that staff has <br /> 465 in making its findings and I have in making my recommendation to you all. <br /> 466 <br /> 467 Beth Bronson-I absolutely agree with you. Because this application falls under"one or more commercial uses", I do want <br /> 468 to highlight the emphasis on"institutional uses", in that sense of this rural community activity node,juxtaposed with the <br /> 469 existing commercial uses that are already in play, in that intersection, in that activity node. Not to say that there's any <br /> 470 question to that, but the fact that the NC2 is designated for the rural community activity node... <br /> 471 <br /> 472 Cy Stober- It was neighborhood commercial versus LC-1 which is local commercial, so they are applied appropriately <br /> 473 based upon their description,the buffers and what is in the ordinance about how they may be consistently integrated and <br /> 474 introduced into an activity node or an area of the county but yes. There's no prescription in that NC 2 can only be in <br /> 475 these activity nodes or LC-1 can only be in these that's not how that works. <br /> 476 <br /> 477 Beth Bronson-So they overlap? <br /> 478 <br /> 479 Cy Stober-Yes. <br /> 480 <br /> 481 Beth Bronson-Agreed.We saw this at the last presentation for the rezoning too. It's coming within this time frame <br /> 482 because it's dissimilar. I think it's important that the board and the community also know that the zoning application is <br /> 483 different which makes it dissimilar which may have already been stated. But I think it's worth underscoring that there's no <br /> 484 longer a local commercial aspect to it. It is a neighborhood commercial ask like a conditional zoning request. <br /> 485 <br /> 486 Cy Stober-Well, there was that question that was significant at the Planning Board meeting in August, regarding <br /> 487 consumption of the... there's an allocation of X number of acreage in each activity node and conditional zoning does not <br /> 488 impact that allocation, so there's still available NC2 and LC-1 acreage,that could be considered for future rezonings. <br /> 489 <br /> 490 Beth Bronson-Thank you for that clarification. <br /> 491 <br /> 492 Lamar Proctor-What is that allocation,for rural community activity node, do you know? <br /> 493 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.