Orange County NC Website
159 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 328 Whitney Watson- Is there any history of that type of retail store drawing additional commercial activities around them to <br /> 329 enhance that node? <br /> 330 <br /> 331 Brian Collie-As far as that question goes, I don't know if I can answer that,we don't have the studies that lead to that. <br /> 332 <br /> 333 Whitney Watson-What about suppressing additional development in that area because of the competition? <br /> 334 <br /> 335 Brian Collie- I can't answer that either. <br /> 336 <br /> 337 Beth Bronson-There are studies out there if you start poking, but they are usually for more urban areas, not rural areas. <br /> 338 <br /> 339 Cy Stober- If you look at the language in the comprehensive plan, it simply makes recommendations about what the <br /> 340 future land use should be in that area. It doesn't really speak to competition between nonresidential uses, so we are <br /> 341 bound and limited by the guidance provided by the comprehensive plan. <br /> 342 <br /> 343 Beth Bronson-Can you clarify to that point that the comprehensive plan does not necessarily specify NR-CD or the NC- <br /> 344 2, but they do specify to local commercial? <br /> 345 <br /> 346 Cy Stober-No, commercial.This was in the slide that Brian already had up. If you look at the last clause, "an appropriate <br /> 347 location for any of the following uses,the institutional uses then the final clauses, one or more commercial uses"that is <br /> 348 the guidance that is provided to us by our comprehensive plan. Imperfect as it may be,that is the guidance that staff has <br /> 349 in making its findings and I have in making my recommendation to you all. <br /> 350 <br /> 351 Beth Bronson- I absolutely agree with you. Because this application falls under"one or more commercial uses", I do want <br /> 352 to highlight the emphasis on "institutional uses", in that sense of this rural community activity node,juxtaposed with the <br /> 353 existing commercial uses that are already in play, in that intersection, in that activity node. Not to say that there's any <br /> 354 question to that, but the fact that the NC-2 is designated for the rural community activity node... <br /> 355 <br /> 356 Cy Stober- It was neighborhood commercial versus LC-1 which is local commercial, so they are applied appropriately <br /> 357 based upon their description,the buffers and what is in the ordinance about how they may be consistently integrated and <br /> 358 introduced into an activity node or an area of the county but yes.There's no prescription in that NC-2 can only be in <br /> 359 these activity nodes or LC-1 can only be in these that's not how that works. <br /> 360 <br /> 361 Beth Bronson-So they overlap? <br /> 362 <br /> 363 Cy Stober-Yes. <br /> 364 <br /> 365 Beth Bronson-Agreed.We saw this at the last presentation for the rezoning too. It's coming within this time frame <br /> 366 because it's dissimilar. I think it's important that the board and the community also know that the zoning application is <br /> 367 different which makes it dissimilar which may have already been stated. But I think it's worth underscoring that there's no <br /> 368 longer a local commercial aspect to it. It is a neighborhood commercial ask like a conditional zoning request. <br /> 369 <br /> 370 Cy Stober-Well,there was that question that was significant at the Planning Board meeting in August, regarding <br /> 371 consumption of the... there's an allocation of X number of acreage in each activity node and conditional zoning does not <br /> 372 impact that allocation,so there's still available NC-2 and LC-1 acreage,that could be considered for future rezonings. <br /> 373 <br /> 374 Beth Bronson-Thank you for that clarification. <br /> 375 <br /> 376 Lamar Proctor-What is that allocation,for rural community activity node, do you know? <br /> 377 <br /> 378 Cy Stober- I don't know. <br /> 379 <br /> 380 Lamar Proctor-But there's a limitation? <br /> 381 <br /> 382 Cy Stober- There is, yes sir. <br />