Browse
Search
OTHER-2023-011 Transit Governance Interlocal Agreement between Orange County Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization and Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Various Documents
>
2020 - 2029
>
2023
>
OTHER-2023-011 Transit Governance Interlocal Agreement between Orange County Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization and Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2023 2:30:10 PM
Creation date
3/14/2023 2:26:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Others
Agenda Item
8-d
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-21-2023; 8-d - Durham & Orange Transit Plan Governance Study – Interlocal Agreement Between OC, Durham-CH-Carr MPO, and Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 02-21-2023 Business Meeting
Agenda for February 21, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2023\Agenda - 02-21-2023 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b . Deny, while providing a list of minor issues, technical corrections, or a specific listing of <br /> Significant Concerns with the Orange County Transit Annual Work Program . <br /> 7 . 04 If the Orange County Board of Commissioners denies the work program and creates a detailed <br /> listing of minor issues, technical corrections, or Significant Concerns for the recommended <br /> Orange County Transit Annual Work Program , Orange County staff shall coordinate with other <br /> SWG members to make corrections and then submit for a second review and recommendation <br /> of approval by the SWG . Upon recommendation of the SWG , the Orange County Board of <br /> Commissioners will then vote on the revised work program . <br /> 7 . 05 Upon approval action taken by the Orange County Board of Commissioners, GoTriangle will then <br /> receive for review and take one of the following actions . <br /> a . Approve the Orange County Transit Annual Work Program as recommended by the SWG <br /> and approved by the Orange County Board of Commissioners; <br /> b . Deny, while providing a list of minor issues, technical corrections, or a specific listing of <br /> Significant Concerns with the Orange County Transit Annual Work Program , <br /> 7 . 06 All parties in this Agreement, or their authorized representative , shall have the right to inspect, <br /> examine , and make copies of any and all books, accounts, invoices, records, electronic files, <br /> agreements, minutes, and other writings and work products related to the funding of Tax <br /> District operations or projects . The cost of any audit or review conducted under the authority of <br /> this Section is the responsibility of the Party requesting the audit or review unless a material <br /> breach is detected , in which case the breaching party shall be responsible for the reasonable <br /> costs of audit or review . <br /> 7 . 07 Implementation . An Operating or Capital Project Funding Agreement shall be consistent with <br /> the requirements outlined in the supporting Comprehensive Participation Agreement . Parties to <br /> this Interlocal Agreement shall endeavor to develop global - level agreements with appropriate <br /> timeframes for each project sponsor seeking to implement operating or capital projects . These <br /> agreements must be prepared prior to distributing funds and starting the Project ( s ) . All <br /> Operating or Capital Project Funding Agreements shall have at least two signatories from <br /> appropriate parties and shall also adhere to the following : <br /> a . MPO Role with Managed Funding : If a project is covered by a global operating or capital <br /> funding agreement that involves federal or state funding that is otherwise under the <br /> distribution and program management responsibility of DCHC MPO , or regardless of <br /> funding source , constitutes a regionally significant project as defined in 23 CFR § <br /> 450 . 104, DCHC MPO shall be a party to the agreement . <br /> b . Tax District Administrator Role : The tax district administrator shall always be a party to <br /> each agreement . <br /> c . County Role : In addition to being a party to any agreement where the County serves as <br /> the project sponsor, the County shall be a party to each agreement where the tax <br /> district administrator is also the project sponsor . <br /> d . Agreement where a special case exists . Parties to an operating or capital project <br /> agreement shall be brought to the tax district administrator as a recommendation for <br /> review and approval by the SWG when a special case arises outside the three categories <br /> described in 7 . 08 . a -c <br /> e . Standalone Agreement Need : When an operating or capital project of significant cost is <br /> programmed and approved , members of the SWG shall review and determine a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.