Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-02-2002 - Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 05-02-2002
>
Agenda - 05-02-2002 - Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 3:24:44 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:38:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/2002
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020502
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br />O. Considering the resistance that CP&L has to accepting NC WARN's plan to store the spent fuel <br />rods, would NC WARN consider and have support for a legal recourse against CP&L for refusing <br />to comply or offer a reasonable alternative? <br />A. On May 15`h, NC WARN and other organizations filed a legal petition seeking to have N. C. <br />Attorney General Roy Cooper take action to prevent further transports to and stockpiling of spent <br />fuel at Shearon Harris. <br />O. NRC offered potassium iodide (KI) to the 34 states with nuclear facilities. Twelve states have <br />taken them upon this offer. Why didn't NC accept? Should we keep it on hand? The U.S. FDA <br />reports 10.5 million kids in Poland and 7 million adults in Poland took and reportedly benefited <br />from KI following Chernobyl. <br />A. The NRC urged each state to consider the KI offer. Governor Easley declined, saying that the <br />state will instead rely on "rapid evacuation." KI can help protect against thyroid cancer from <br />exposure to radioactive iodine, but has no protective value for exposure to other radionuclides. <br />O. I need to know what would happen to our home and our pets (if I couldn't get them all in the car) <br />in case of nuclear accident. I plan to take all of us and all of our animals in the car, but it won't be <br />easy unless we take two cars, which will add to the traffic, but we may have to do it. Could we <br />ever return to our home or would it (and our farm) just be totally worthless? <br />A. It is possible that contamination levels could be so high you would not be able to return home. <br />Homeowner insurance will not cover a loss due to a radiation disaster. You might, however, be <br />required to continue payments on your mortgage. <br />O. If or when there is damage to control room, i.e., brain of a nuclear facility, is there 'not' an <br />automatic reactor shut down? <br />A. Yes. The control rods, which shut down the nuclear reactor by stopping the chain reaction, are <br />designed to be fail-safe. If the control room is disabled, the control rods will be automatically <br />inserted into the reactor within seconds to shut down the chain reaction. Unfortunately, the <br />insertion of the control rods does not terminate heat production. Even after the chain reaction is <br />stopped, the reactor core continues to generate about 7 percent of the heat it produced at full <br />power. For a large reactor like Shearon Harris, that's plenty of heat. If that heat is not removed, <br />the shut down reactor core can overheat and be damaged. <br />Consider Three Mile Island. The reactor was shut down around 4 am. Operators mistakenly <br />turned off the cooling systems. Around 6:15 am, the reactor core overheated to the point where it <br />partially melted down. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.