Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 <br /> •. Abest-case scenario for the beginning of construction (assuming the project begins July <br /> 2002 and there are no unforeseen delays) <br /> • A projected park opening date (again assuming no unforeseen delays), and <br /> • The actions that would be needed at this time far the Board to pursue the perk project <br /> It is important to note that the bealcase sconado for construction and park opening <br /> assumes each project begins between May and July 1 of this year. This was done to <br /> allow the based to see and compare the relative nature of each, on an equivalent <br /> basis. The reality is that staff and financial resource limitations will likely make it <br /> impossible for each of the projects to run simultaneously beginning July 1, so some <br /> staggering of activities and projects will be needed. However, each project Is already <br /> st different stages of planning,which lands itself well W a staggered approach. <br /> Because the Chapel Hill Township Park is pad of a much-larger Master Plan concept for a <br /> park and educational campus, a separate document has been prepared to outline In greater <br /> detail the proposed approach to this design. For purposes of this document, It is assumed <br /> Mat the Chapel Hill Township Park will be a County park, although substantial involvement <br /> from the Chapel Hill-Canboro City Schools and the Town of Carrboro has also been <br /> proposed in the separate 'Chapel Hill Township Park and Educational Campus.' The <br /> process outlined in the summary sheet far this poject Is consistent with that considered by <br /> the Board this evening. <br /> The document concludes with a brief summary of other joint projects—projects that would be <br /> covered by the Intergovernmental Park Work Group's"Proposed Joint Planning Process for <br /> Joint CountyROwn Parks and Open Space Projects." Finally,a brief summary of other <br /> County projects not pad of the 2801 bond(McGowan Creek Preserve, Little River Regional <br /> Park)is also provided <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: There Is no financial impact related to discussion of the PFP process, <br /> although decisions on the order of projects undertaken does have financial implications. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board review and discuss the <br /> PFP draft, providing feedback as desired, and that this item be brought back for Boats action <br /> as a part of the setting of phonies during future CIP discussions. <br />