Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
25 <br /> 1 Slide #6 <br /> MWS <br /> a,a.v..,dar.5..r,W—swb. c-d',.,dvew[iff � <br /> F[MxdW^sPOs,yN <br /> M1mq rtCwcolrlm�hC—Vki.F.�.nd�.asa roe L C...daW <br /> —� '�14r 4 rw oPb¢'t• 1 <br /> 7=7 6...,q.•,v Aay.nn --u ti Lax+S+ha,� �_ftiw11<•a.,.'�YF�,�AP.�1 4il <br /> ra:ic:�,cr xA. r lr C:ne.v Pia, Yr.wi,i fr'i,.1.OPv+a.,r`a[w <br /> ' wr�oxmrurcnuvn.w,.�� <br /> 7..,,� <br /> >M+f <br /> dIY�F.k+4a.•:r i <br /> ■.,�t<rrwuo..w+[tee..+.+-•:..' .:� �, <br /> [KCr[IY]fle'1roY_�-l_.e[li.'4MIr-f+H:imb?ry <br /> h <br /> 6 _ <br /> ORANGE COUN i <br /> NOFM a CAROLINA <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Cy Stober said SAPFO is required separately from the plat review process and the process <br /> 4 for that will remain unchanged. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Slide #7 <br /> Staff Analysis & Recommendation <br /> • Planning Director recommends agyroyal of the to t <br /> amendment, as presented, to effe tively remove the <br /> schools signature block requirement. <br /> • Planning Director recommends approval of: <br /> - The Statement of Consistency that the amendments are reasonable.In <br /> the put lic Fnterest. and serve Land Use Goal 6 (Attachment 1); and <br /> - The proposed ordlnan-ce to amend UDO 7.13.3(F)(3)(g)(Attachment 2). <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> t OWn L CAROLINA <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br />