Orange County NC Website
20 <br /> 1 Slide #10 <br /> Recommendation for Tonight <br /> The Manager recommends the Board: <br /> 1. Conduct the public hearing and accept the Planning <br /> Boardlstaff recommendations and publiccomment; <br /> • Public hearing was advertised as required by State and local laws <br /> 2. Close the public hearing; <br /> 3. Deliberate as desired; and <br /> d. Vote to approve the Statement of Consistency (Attachment <br /> 1)and Ordinance Amending the Unified Development <br /> Ordinance(Attachment 2), as presented. <br /> OR <br /> Vote to deny the staff-initiated text amendment, due to a <br /> stated reason that the request is inconsistent with the goals <br /> and objectives of the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. <br /> GRANGE COUNTY <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #11 <br /> Questions from Commissioners <br /> Public Comments <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> N)ORTI I CAR01_INA <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Commissioner Greene clarified that if there was a 4,000 square ft. dwelling, the ADU could <br /> 7 be 2,000 square ft. <br /> 8 Cy Stober said yes. <br /> 9 Commissioner Hamilton said the ADU could be bigger than the primary dwelling. <br /> 10 Cy Stober said if a larger dwelling were to be built on property with an existing dwelling, <br /> 11 the existing dwelling would then have to be operated as the accessory dwelling unit. <br /> 12 Commissioner Hamilton asked if there should there be space requirements for parking, <br /> 13 since ADUs can potentially hold many people. <br /> 14 Cy Stober said the same parking standards would apply based on bedrooms per dwelling <br /> 15 unit. He said the occupancy of the dwelling would be based on the utility capacity and <br /> 16 Environmental Health requirements. <br /> 17 Commissioner Hamilton said this isn't clear from the amendments here. <br /> 18 Cy Stober said staff will follow up with another text amendment to make that clear. <br /> 19 Vice Chair McKee asked if impervious surface requirements would still be in effect. <br />