Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
22 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 1 Excerpt of Draft MEETING MINUTES <br /> 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 3 Minutes DECEMBER 7,2022 <br /> 4 REGULAR MEETING <br /> 5 <br /> 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Adam Beeman (Chair), Cedar Grove Township Representative; Lamar Proctor(Vice-Chair), <br /> 7 Cheeks Township Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Melissa Poole, Little River <br /> 8 Township Representative; Beth Bronson,At-Large Representative; Randy Marshall,At-Large Representative; Charity <br /> 9 Kirk,At-Large Representative; Susan Hunter, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township <br /> 10 Representative; <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 MEMBERS ABSENT: Whitney Watson,At-Large Representative; Delores Bailey,At-Large Representative; Steve <br /> 14 Kaufmann, Bingham Township Representative; <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Perdita Holtz, Special Projects&GIS Supervisor; Pat <br /> 18 Mallet, Erosion Control, Stormwater& Engineering Supervisor; Taylor Perschau, Current Planning and Zoning <br /> 19 Supervisor; Brian Collie, Planner 11;Tyler Sliger, Planner 11; Carlos Sanchez, Planning Technician;Tina Love, <br /> 20 Administrative Support <br /> 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL <br /> 24 Chair Adam Beeman called the meeting to order <br /> 25 <br /> 26 ***************************** <br /> 27 <br /> 28 AGENDA ITEM 8: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(UDO)TEXT AMENDMENT—NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETINGS <br /> 29 -To make a recommendation to the BOCC on proposed amendments to the UDO pertaining to <br /> 30 Neighborhood Information Meetings. This item was introduced at the August 3, 2022 ORC meeting <br /> 31 and reviewed at the October 5, 2022 Planning Board meeting where it was continued to the next <br /> 32 meeting. It is scheduled for a BOCC Public Hearing in January. <br /> 33 PRESENTER: Tyler Sliger, Planner II <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Tyler Sliger reviewed the proposed UDO text amendment for Neighborhood Information Meetings(NIMs) <br /> 36 <br /> 37 David Blankfard: I thought we had recommended that staff be a witness at all NIMs <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Cy Stober: As with all text amendments and zoning amendments,these are reviewed by the County Attorney's Office <br /> 40 and the legal counsel wants to leave the matter of verification open but required so that attendance at the meeting could <br /> 41 be one form of verification but to allow for other forms of verification, streaming video,video recording to provide <br /> 42 evidence because it doesn't rely on individual testimony should anything be taken to the Court of Appeals. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Charity Kirk: How do you know that they have posted the signs? <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Tyler Sliger: In the written report we can make it a requirement that they send a picture of the posting. That is something <br /> 47 that I do with mine when I have a NIM, I take a picture of where I put it on the property and attach it. I have it in my <br /> 48 report that they have to fill out. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Charity Kirk: I think our problem is we want proof that citizens that are in the area are invited, are allowed to participate in <br /> 51 the meeting and the meeting actually happened. Without someone there how do we do that? <br /> 52 <br /> 53 Beth Bronson:There is a checklist, is that included in the Planning Board's agenda package? <br /> 54 <br />