Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-12-2004-6
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 02-12-2004
>
Agenda - 02-12-2004-6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2013 12:21:17 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:38:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/12/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20040212
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
achieve that goal. 5o what I'm going to ask the Board to do tonight, to consider, is <br />this proposal here. (He distributed the proposal to the County Commissioners and <br />staff and offered it to the public). It's clear to me that there is common ground on <br />some things that we've addressed in this context of merger, in this discussion of <br />merger and equal funding. The one thing that there's clear common ground on, and <br />I coined that phrase from one of the members of the audience here tonight, the <br />common ground that everybody was encouraging us to find on this issue of equal <br />funding and merger. But that common ground is associated with the fact that <br />everybody agrees that the school systems are unequally funded and the funding <br />scenario is inequitable between the two, and that we need to address providing <br />additional funds for the County school system children immediately. We need to fix <br />that, and we have it within our power to fix that immediately, The other thing that I've <br />heard people say is that they think that this issue is too important for Commissioners <br />alone to be deciding, that they want the public to decide it. And although I've come a <br />long way too since we've discussed this, I really wanted the Commissioners to <br />decide the issue of merger and moving in the direction of merger, but it's clear to me <br />after discussion on the 11th and after the discussion tonight, that this Board is not <br />ready to make that decision, and I respect this Board's decision on that, and this <br />Board's position on that. In view of the fact that this Board is not ready, it may be at <br />some future date, it may be. I think it's incumbent upon us to begin now to provide a <br />clear direction for the public on where we ought to go, and I think the public, to some <br />extent, is ahead of us on this. At least that's what I'm sensing, And although it <br />makes me nervous to put this proposal forward because we may still end up with two <br />school systems if the public decides to go that route, I don't think the public will <br />decide to go that route, because I think the public has come along far enough now to <br />recognize that it is going to be in all of our best interests to have a merged school <br />system sooner rather than later. <br />Consequently, I'm asking this Board to consider putting a referendum forward <br />in the primaries in May of next year to ask the public to vote on adopting a <br />countywide supplemental school tax, or voting on merging the two school systems. <br />What that means is that the status quo is unacceptable because that's what the <br />people have told us, the status quo is unacceptable, and that many people would <br />prefer to have the public decide this issue rather than the County Commissioners In <br />any event, it will provide some additional funds for the County school system <br />immediately, beginning next year hopefully. And it would also indicate whether there <br />was enough public support for merger for us to move forward with that. And I <br />recognize that if the public chose merger in the vote next May, or whenever the <br />primary is held, it's not necessarily a binding decision for the Commissioners. But I <br />think that if the public chose it, this Board would be required, which we would require <br />ourselves, we would decide in advance that we are going to pursue implementation <br />of that public non - binding decision. And, as you can see from the proposal that I've <br />put forward, I had hoped that we could make the decision to move forward to merge <br />the systems by July 2006. But in view of the fact that we are not going to make the <br />decision tonight or in February, then I think the July of 2007 timeframe would be the <br />only one that would be meaningful in this context if the public decided that we should <br />merge the systems. I'm asking the Board to consider this option of giving the public <br />the option of deciding to adopt a countywide supplemental tax, or merge the <br />systems. Now that's not inconsistent with the collaboration discussion we just had <br />because if the public decides that they want a countywide supplemental tax rather <br />than to merge the systems, we will need that collaboration. We will need the benefit <br />of all the decisions that result from that process. And if that process concludes itself <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.