Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2023; 8-d - Durham & Orange Transit Plan Governance Study – Interlocal Agreement Between OC, Durham-CH-Carr MPO, and Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
Agenda - 02-21-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-21-2023; 8-d - Durham & Orange Transit Plan Governance Study – Interlocal Agreement Between OC, Durham-CH-Carr MPO, and Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 11:01:15 AM
Creation date
2/16/2023 10:56:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-d
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 21, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2023\Agenda - 02-21-2023 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> SWG members to make corrections and then submit for a second review and recommendation <br /> of approval by the SWG. Upon recommendation of the SWG,the Orange County Board of <br /> Commissioners will then vote on the revised work program. <br /> 7.05 Upon approval action taken by the Orange County Board of Commissioners, GoTriangle will then <br /> receive for review and take one of the following actions: <br /> a. Approve the Orange County Transit Annual Work Program as recommended by the SWG <br /> and approved by the Orange County Board of Commissioners; <br /> b. Deny, while providing a list of minor issues, technical corrections, or a specific listing of <br /> Significant Concerns with the Orange County Transit Annual Work Program. <br /> 7.06 All parties in this Agreement, or their authorized representative, shall have the right to inspect, <br /> examine, and make copies of any and all books, accounts, invoices, records, electronic files, <br /> agreements, minutes, and other writings and work products related to the funding of Tax <br /> District operations or projects.The cost of any audit or review conducted under the authority of <br /> this Section is the responsibility of the Party requesting the audit or review unless a material <br /> breach is detected, in which case the breaching party shall be responsible for the reasonable <br /> costs of audit or review. <br /> 7.07 Implementation. An Operating or Capital Project Funding Agreement shall be consistent with <br /> the requirements outlined in the supporting Com prehensiveM aster Participation Agreement. <br /> Parties to this Interlocal Agreement shall endeavor to developIg obale+-level agreements <br /> with appropriate timeframes for each project sponsor seeking to implement operating or capital <br /> projects.These agreements must be prepared prior to distributing funds and starting the <br /> Project(s). All Operating or Capital Project Funding Agreements shall have at least two <br /> signatories from appropriate parties and shall also adhere to the following: <br /> a. MPO Role with Managed Funding: If a project is covered by aI�obalr operating or <br /> capital funding agreement that involves federal or state funding that is otherwise under <br /> the distribution and program management responsibility of DCHC MPO, or regardless of <br /> funding source, constitutes a regionally significant project as defined in 23 CFR § <br /> 450.104, DCHC MPO shall be a party to the agreement. <br /> b. Tax District Administrator Role: The tax district administrator shall always be a party to <br /> each agreement. <br /> c. County Role: In addition to being a party to any agreement where the County serves as <br /> the project sponsor,the County shall be a party to each agreement where the tax <br /> district administrator is also the project sponsor. <br /> d. Agreement where a special case exists. Parties to an operating or capital project <br /> agreement shall be brought to the tax district administrator as a recommendation for <br /> review and approval by the SWG when a special case arises outside the three categories <br /> described in 7.08.a-c <br /> e. Standalone Agreement Need: When an operating or capital project of significant cost is <br /> programmed and approved, members of the SWG shall review and determine a <br /> significant-cost threshold that requires a standalone agreement to be developed and <br /> signed by all appropriate parties. <br /> 7.08 Interim Work Program. In the event a resolution cannot be met to address the list of issues or <br /> technical corrections upon a vote of denial from either party highlighted in 7.03 &7.05, an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.