Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2023; 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment – Neighborhood Information Meetings
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2023
>
Agenda - 02-21-2023 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 02-21-2023; 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment – Neighborhood Information Meetings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 10:58:39 AM
Creation date
2/16/2023 10:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2023
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 21, 2023 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2023\Agenda - 02-21-2023 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 220 <br /> 221 Lamar Proctor: I withdraw the motion but I would make a motion to ask Planning staff to investigate potential expansion <br /> 222 of NIM notification and report back to the Planning Board in 120 days. <br /> 223 <br /> 224 Randy Marshall: I second <br /> 225 <br /> 226 Beth Bronson: Is it just the NIM? <br /> 227 <br /> 228 Lamar Proctor: I don't think you can mess with notification requirements for other things that are mandated by statute. <br /> 229 Since the NIM is voluntary, my thinking is that people in the County don't know something is happening until the ground <br /> 230 is breaking and they want to know why it is in their backyard and by that point it is way too late. I am trying to serve the <br /> 231 citizens of Orange County to get a little bit greater increase in notice so that the word spreads. <br /> 232 <br /> 233 Overlapping conversations <br /> 234 <br /> 235 Adam Beeman: The motion is for the planning staff to come back within 120 days to discuss the potential expansion of <br /> 236 the notification range on the NIMs? <br /> 237 <br /> 238 Lamar Proctor: Yes <br /> 239 <br /> 240 Charity Kirk: Notification range in general if possible. <br /> 241 <br /> 242 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to ask Planning staff to investigate potential expansion of NIM notification and report back to <br /> 243 the Planning Board in 120 days. Seconded by Randy Marshall. <br /> 244 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY <br /> 245 <br /> 246 Adam Beeman: So now I need a motion to approve. <br /> 247 <br /> 248 Overlapping conversations <br /> 249 <br /> 250 MOTION BY Charity Kirk to approve the LIDO text amendment for the Neighborhood Information Meetings with the <br /> 251 approved amendment and the Statement of Consistency. Seconded by Beth Bronson. <br /> 252 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY <br /> 253 <br /> 254 ************************************** <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.