Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-16-2002 - 9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 04-16-2002
>
Agenda - 04-16-2002 - 9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2017 4:31:47 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:37:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/16/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020416
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
NS Orange County/Hillsborough Courtesy Review Agreement
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T <br /> r <br /> 2 <br /> agenda review and distribution schedules. The process proposed in Orange County by staff <br /> includes forwarding the material to the BOCC as soon as possible through hard copy or e-mail <br /> without staff comment. Staff and BOCC comment independently and the comments are <br /> collected, incorporated and distributed to Town of Hillsborough by staff. <br /> A flowchart for the internal distribution process is attached. <br /> Either jurisdiction may request a joint meeting of the elected boards to discuss a development <br /> proposal subject to courtesy review. The request shall be made in writing by the reviewing <br /> jurisdiction when comments are submitted or in writing by the approving jurisdiction upon receipt <br /> of comments. When either party requests a joint meeting, the approving jurisdiction agrees to <br /> delay its approval process for the project in question in order to accommodate the joint meeting. <br /> If such a meeting is scheduled, the developer will provide five (5) additional copies of the <br /> development proposal application. <br /> The timeframe of a five-day 'tumaround' for comments can be difficult in some cases, so an <br /> increased timeframe may be warranted for certain projects. This issue can be discussed at the <br /> meeting. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is possible personnel resource impact as an existing planner <br /> would add to their responsibilities and be assigned to react to proposals in relatively short time <br /> frames and attend meetings to understand the proposal and offer comment. <br /> RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration recommends that the Board approve the revised <br /> agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.