Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 661 store going there right now. It's just not necessary. It's like in my mind you look at CVS and Walgreens they go across <br /> 662 from each other,whatever happened to Rite Aid,we have a bunch of empty Rite Aid buildings because CVS and <br /> 663 Walgreens knocked them off and you've got AutoZone and all those guys next door they all want to be next to each <br /> 664 other and compete with each other but I just don't see this, it's not necessary there is not enough, they already said it <br /> 665 they have to reduce their parking spaces just because their numbers aren't going to hit the full parking spot. It's just not <br /> 666 necessary. It's reduncency upon reduncency and if there was a tire shop, heck you've got one down the street, a tire <br /> 667 shop,you don't need one of those. There's all sorts of better uses that I think we could put there and they'll hook onto <br /> 668 Efland Cedar Grove and run down Efland Cedar Grove to avoid 86 so they don't ever get any further than that and that's <br /> 669 what they are counting on. The catch is the out of state traffic running by and I understand the taxes but we turned down <br /> 670 Buc-ee's which was printing money and I don't see a Dollar Tree, a Family Dollar, is going to provide that much tax <br /> 671 money to justify a building that maybe 5 years down the road is abandoned and it's just sitting there as an eye sore. 1 <br /> 672 don't know it might thrive who knows, there's too much reduncency there. We don't need a shopping mall up in the top <br /> 673 of the County and that's essentially what you're trying to provide is multiple choices. We have choices. <br /> 674 <br /> 675 Statler Gilfillen: Would you like to make a motion one way or the other, I think we're at that point? <br /> 676 <br /> 677 Adam Beeman: No. It's up to you guys, I can say I am against it but that's the only motion that we're at. <br /> 678 <br /> 679 Statler Gilfillen: I think somebody has to do a motion. <br /> 680 <br /> 681 Charity Kirk: Are we done with questions? <br /> 682 <br /> 683 Beth Bronson: Anybody have questions? <br /> 684 <br /> 685 Overlapping conversations <br /> 686 <br /> 687 Adam Beeman: Does anyone else have any questions or concerns? <br /> 688 <br /> 689 Lamar Proctor: Can I make a comment? I asked Planning about this and I'm looking at Appendix F and even if we're <br /> 690 trying to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map, this area the red circle is a Rural Industrial Activity Node, this is a <br /> 691 retail space which when I look at the Table of Permitted Uses, seems to suggest a zoning designation of LC-1 or NC-2 <br /> 692 things that would allow for retail establishments. Under Appendix F,the Rural Industrial Activity Node suggests stuff that <br /> 693 falls more under 1-1 which is Light Industrial so I don't think that this is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the <br /> 694 Comprehensive Plan because it is a use that would fall more under something that in the Future Land Use Map would be <br /> 695 Rural Community Activity Node or Rural Neighborhood Activity Node or a Commercial Transition Activity Node or CITAN <br /> 696 area. I don't think it's consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the uses that were anticipated under a Rural Industrial <br /> 697 Activity Node that it is cited as in that red circle. <br /> 698 <br /> 699 Adam Beeman: I would say that I would prefer them not to take business away from the Farm and Garden store that just <br /> 700 reopened by the dump off of Walnut Grove they sell local Bison, beef, chicken, all sort of meat and fresh produce. That's <br /> 701 right down the street from where this proposal is so why would we want to put someone out of business or take people <br /> 702 away from that store that just came back after being burnt down and they are providing goods from the community where <br /> 703 they are selling local beef and meat and vegetables versus trucked in corn nibbles. <br /> 704 <br /> 705 David Blankfard: Before you make a motion, are there any conditions that would change anybody's opinion? <br /> 706 <br /> 707 Adam Beeman: Not mine. <br /> 708 <br /> 709 Beth Bronson: Is this going to be sold to or is it going to be leased to? <br /> 710 <br /> 711 Overlapping conversations <br /> 712 <br /> 713 Doug Burr: We would be buying the 7 acres so he would still have the remaining. <br /> 714 <br /> 715 <br />