Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-15-2022; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 11-15-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-15-2022; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2022 2:50:16 PM
Creation date
11/10/2022 2:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for November 15, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 11-15-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> 1 every hand gesture to determine if a "protest" is occurring? <br /> 2 9 - Will the Sheriff's department have to spend time and resources responding to complaints <br /> 3 about "picketing," when they could instead be helping prevent and solve actual crimes? <br /> 4 10 - Since the ordinance claims that enrolled students are not subject to this ordinance <br /> 5 because: "such students are governed by school district rules and regulations," isn't it actually <br /> 6 the case that that statement can't ever be true on property outside a school's physical <br /> 7 boundaries, because the school district has no legal authority to control property outside a <br /> 8 school's boundaries? <br /> 9 11 - Given the words in Section 24-5(c)(1) of your ordinance: "Picketing on state owned or <br /> 10 federally owned property is not subject to the terms and prohibitions of this section," does that <br /> 11 mean that, because there are state owned roads adjacent to EVERY school (except one) in <br /> 12 Orange County, picketing is actually allowed by this ordinance everywhere you'd like to ban? <br /> 13 12 -And finally, does that therefore mean that the protest outside the Orange High football <br /> 14 event last fall and the parent handing out information near New Hope Elementary this spring <br /> 15 would be completely untouched by this proposed ordinance? (The two events cited by the OCS <br /> 16 Board and staff as reasons to push for this ordinance.) <br /> 17 He asked that the County Attorney answer all of these questions, in front of the public, during <br /> 18 the next BOCC Business meeting. <br /> 19 Tara Stewart asked the Commissioners to remove this from consideration forever. She <br /> 20 said that the previous school board has pattern of silencing and that they asked this board to <br /> 21 create this ordinance under false pretenses. She said there has been no evidence of laws <br /> 22 broken, etc. She said that law enforcement has said actions were legal. She said that passing <br /> 23 the ordinance will lead to increased instances with law enforcement caught in the middle. She <br /> 24 said that restricting free speech for everyone is not how to protect children. She said it is a <br /> 25 blatant violation of the first amendment. <br /> 26 Kim Pettineo said she is not asking the BOCC to solve school system issues, but it is <br /> 27 important for the context to be added. She said that the school board has consistently made it <br /> 28 difficult and sometimes impossible for the public to attend events or make public comment. She <br /> 29 said they are now trying to use law enforcement to intimidate and show favor to individuals who <br /> 30 supported the school board's views. She said the Board cuts off those speaking with opposing <br /> 31 views. She said they banned citizens from attending future meetings and in one case, because <br /> 32 of the way they were dressed. She said that in zero cases did board members respond to the <br /> 33 emails. She said that one member went out to physically intimidate parents on a public road. <br /> 34 She said this was sanctioned by the school board. She said the BOCC has been strung along <br /> 35 by the previous school board. She said that the purpose is not to protect children, but continue <br /> 36 the pattern of parent suppression. <br /> 37 Gretchen Schmid said she is speaking on behalf of Moms for Liberty. She said at a <br /> 38 school board meeting that many residents came to participate, but all but ten had to wait outside <br /> 39 the building. She said she attended the meeting and listened to those who were disagreeing <br /> 40 with decisions made by the school board. She said that people were upset with the overreach of <br /> 41 the school board. She said that Mr. Zachary spoke that night and that he is a grandfather whose <br /> 42 family has been in the area for over 200 years and a part of the Quaker settlement who taught <br /> 43 Black children to read and write and also helped many slaves escape on the Underground <br /> 44 Railroad. She said that he wore an indigenous costume to represent his Great Great <br /> 45 Grandmother who had been left with a white man in 1829 so that she would not have to walk on <br /> 46 the Trail of Tears. She said that part of the man's clothing included a hunting spear that <br /> 47 deputies confiscated and held at the library door during the meeting. She said at the Board of <br /> 48 Commissioners meeting on June 22 that Carrie Doyle and Patrick Abele presented reasons to <br /> 49 limit protesting at schools. She said there were three situations of protest and discussed two <br /> 50 school board meetings, with one being where the gentlemen was dressed in indigenous <br /> 51 costume. She said that the irony of these comments is that each school board meeting starts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.