Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-15-2022; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 11-15-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-15-2022; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2022 2:50:16 PM
Creation date
11/10/2022 2:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for November 15, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 11-15-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> 1 consideration. At the June 2, 2022 work session, the Board determined to move forward with <br /> 2 an ordinance prohibiting picketing on School Property. At the June 21, 2022, Business meeting <br /> 3 the Board determined the ordinance would be brought back at its meeting in October. The <br /> 4 agenda materials for each prior discussion may be viewed at the links above. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Pursuant to the Board's prior discussions and input, the County Attorney revised the draft <br /> 7 ordinance which generally provides as follows: <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Only covers Picketing conducted on, or within a yet-to-be-determined number of linear <br /> 10 feet of, School Property and Public Playgrounds including on any public right of way <br /> 11 within that distance; <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Recent changes to North Carolina law provide that when a local ordinance involves a potential <br /> 14 criminal penalty, the ordinance may not be adopted at the meeting at which it is first introduced. <br /> 15 Such an ordinance may only be adopted at the next regular meeting following its introduction. <br /> 16 Because one potential penalty of this ordinance is trespass, which is a statutory misdemeanor, <br /> 17 this ordinance may only be adopted at its second reading. Due to the multiple substantive <br /> 18 revisions requested by the Board at prior meetings, the County Attorney recommended this item <br /> 19 be reconsidered at a new first reading. If, at this first reading, the Board determines to move <br /> 20 forward with this ordinance, the second reading will occur at the Board's October 18, 2022 <br /> 21 Business meeting. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 John Roberts reviewed the background information for the item. He said one of the items <br /> 24 left open at the last meeting was the buffer area from the schools. He said he suggests a 50 ft. <br /> 25 buffer from entrances to the school property. He said that would accomplish the goal of keeping <br /> 26 it away from students. He said the Board also should discuss the limit on the number of people <br /> 27 and he would suggest adding language along the lines of "this ordinance does not apply to <br /> 28 those that have appointments with teachers or staff." He said he has clarified at previous <br /> 29 meeting that all rights within the Bill of Rights are subject to reasonable restrictions; even <br /> 30 speech. He said that protests and demonstrations are not currently allowed and that this <br /> 31 ordinance would simply extend that to the entrances and into the public right of way. He said <br /> 32 this would not do anything the school board cannot currently do except extend it into the public <br /> 33 right of way. <br /> 34 Monique Felder, Superintendent of Orange County Schools, addressed the Board. She <br /> 35 said that Orange County Schools teachers, students, and staff had an up close encounter with <br /> 36 those expressing their First Amendment rights. She said that they support the First Amendment <br /> 37 and those expressing their rights but hold exception to those that are doing so in very close <br /> 38 proximity to students and staff. She said specifically, those that are in the NCDOT right of way. <br /> 39 She said that after the traumatic event last fall at their school, the school board and she <br /> 40 received a lot of feedback from students and staff. She read comments they received after the <br /> 41 protest at Orange County Schools last fall: <br /> 42 "1 felt afraid. Afraid for you, for me, our students and our staff. I want to comfort my <br /> 43 students and reassure them that I will be able to care for them. After this experience, 1 <br /> 44 am not able to offer my students that reassurance for their safety. I cannot believe they <br /> 45 were allowed to be so close to our school, even with a non-violent protest. Knowing that <br /> 46 they are easily able to access our campus without repercussions makes me fearful of <br /> 47 school-related violence. I personally felt very unsafe. I would just like to say that the <br /> 48 protesters made me feel very unsafe at school. I was worried that something might <br /> 49 happen where I, or other people, would be injured. I felt threatened by their gathering, <br /> 50 yelling, their sign holding so close to the school. I wanted you to know that the students <br /> 51 do not feel safe knowing that a group can post up, in large numbers, outside of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.