Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 5-c - 2022 Orange County Transit Plan Update – Public Hearing
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 5-c - 2022 Orange County Transit Plan Update – Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 3:04:07 PM
Creation date
10/27/2022 3:07:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-c
Document Relationships
Agenda for November 1, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
OTHER-2022-058-Orange County Transit Plan Update
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03 44 transit. <br /> Hillsborough to Duke Hospital; and from northern Carrboro/Chapel <br /> continuing Hill (including the Blue Hill District]to Duke hospitals. <br /> INFO pandemic • . <br /> EXPRESS For transit trips ending in Orange County, there are opportunities <br /> The • pandemic to improve transit competitiveness for trips between southeastern <br /> . <br /> disrupted public health Durham County, northern Durham, the Brier Creek area, eastern <br /> • • , • quality of • . • Cary, and northern Raleigh and ending in the Downtown/UNC <br /> BUS STOP • _ County. Transit is area. It is currently possible to travel between these areas using <br /> particularly affected because transit, but it requires at least one transfer and routes tend to be <br /> operations and ridership are indirect, both of which undermine the competitiveness of transit. <br /> predicated on close proximity to many people. <br /> Transit Trerii.A <br /> • expected . disrupt our daily Two kinds of transit trends (for the period 2012-2018) guided <br /> anotherlives for _ to three years. COVID- decisions for the Orange County Transit Plan Update. These <br /> economic19's effects on recovery will likely trends, direct (trips, ridership, and revenue) and indirect (gas <br /> outlast direct public health impacts. Over the prices, economic factors, competing modes), help transit service <br /> horizon of - 2020 Orange • providers focus investments and make decisions to improve <br /> Transit Plan Update, the pandernic may impact service. <br /> economic growth forecasts; • •-term impactsDIRECT <br /> are more uncertain. Total Annual Ridership <br /> Chapel Hill Transit and GoTriangle had the most boardings in the <br /> Short-termimpacts ' volatile as public region (6.0 and 1.7 million, respectively); Orange County Public <br /> health • public transit officials continueto Transit had notably fewer boardings on their fixed-route operations <br /> respond • virus-related issues. COVID-19 (17,852). Each provider served a similar number of trips in 2018 as <br /> reduced - •' • affected ••' - by they did in 2012. OCPT ridership fluctuated the most among the <br /> mandating - -•- - • fare collection three providers over the time period considered (15,000 trips in <br /> changes; and generated ••- • . .•- 2012, about 24,000 in 2017, and 18,000 trips in 2018). <br /> Sales tax • other local • • sources <br /> support - local and regional transit agencies Service Hours <br /> are more unpredictable. Service hours represent the total time during which a transit <br /> vehicle offers revenue service.Total annual service hours provide <br /> _ • _ of developingthe • _ County a general quantification of how much transit service an agency <br /> Transit Plan Update attempted to build in the provides and is useful for understanding each agency's role in the <br /> flexibility needed • regional transit network. CHT provides around 160,000 service <br /> uncertainties including: hours per year - the most of the three Orange County providers. <br /> The evolution CHT's local routes are shorter relative to the other providers and <br /> • • • • • focused on downtown Chapel Hill and UNC. GoTriangle provided <br /> individual ' comfort proximity 143,000 service hours in 2018,up 33%from 2012.Routes primarily <br /> othersaffecting people's operate during peak commuting periods with lengthier travel times <br /> Changes ' how we workand between regional destinations. OCPT accrues the least service <br /> live hours annually of the three providers(approximately 5,500 service <br /> Shifts in anticipated • hours annually), owing to a significantly smaller service portfolio. <br /> all levels of government <br /> Disruptions in the recoveryprocess • - to Productivity <br /> new waves of outbreaks. Measures of transit productivity offer a way to compare system <br /> performance while accounting for the varying sizes of transit <br /> Even with these heightened - - of agencies. Boardings Per Service Hour considers the number <br /> maintaining useful transit system is critical to of people using an available transit service. A higher number of <br /> the lives of people, boardings per service hours indicates more productive service. <br /> long-term success of transit is essential to the Cost Per Rider considers the cost of each boarding relative to the <br /> long-term • _ transit service provider's annual operating costs.A lower cost per <br /> rider indicates more productive service. Cost per rider is impacted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.