Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 5-c - 2022 Orange County Transit Plan Update – Public Hearing
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 5-c - 2022 Orange County Transit Plan Update – Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 3:04:07 PM
Creation date
10/27/2022 3:07:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-c
Document Relationships
Agenda for November 1, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
OTHER-2022-058-Orange County Transit Plan Update
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 02 orangecounty. <br /> undue transportation burdens on minority population groups. <br /> Income, vehicle availability, and age are indicators that help equit & orang <br /> UITYe <br /> identify transit need. CONNECTION• counry. <br /> It is difficult to provide useful transit to residents in distant, Orange • • - <br /> harder-to-reach areas as the additional distance means thatthe to thriving communities <br /> cost per ride is much higher. There are several geographically- that enjoy the benefits <br /> isolated, high-poverty neighborhoods in Orange County which BUS STOP proximity to major <br /> are harder to serve with cost-effective transit (i.e., rural areas univ_rsities and _ of the <br /> research <br /> outside the town boundaries of Hillsborough, Mebane, Chapel preeminentworldbiotech <br /> Hill, Carrboro, and Durham). Providing residents with meaningful industry hubs. However, Orange County <br /> transit options requires supportive land use and housing policies also "has the largest income inequality for a <br /> that allow lower income residents to live closer to high-quality county with _ residents <br /> _ <br /> transit service. <br /> the state"despite being one of the healthiest <br /> People in households without vehicles are not necessarily counties in NorthCarolina. <br /> "transit-dependent" but are more likely to use transit because <br /> they do not have a car in their driveway, always ready to go. Children living in poverty are a useful <br /> Few people in and around Orange County live without a car, so indicator of -• - residents <br /> overall densities of zero- car-households is low. The highest represent 64% of Orange County's <br /> levels are found within and immediately around downtown population, . ', of white children <br /> Chapel Hill, where non-car options (transit, bike share and bike below the poverty •. and Black/ <br /> infrastructure, etc.) are most abundant. Beyond this area, there African American residents . •, <br /> are a few pockets where zero-car household densities are higher, and 11% of the Orange County population <br /> primarily rural areas between Hillsborough and Chapel Hill. respectively, , •, of Hispanicchildren <br /> As a demographic group, seniors (65+) are less likely to own and 24% of Black children are living in <br /> poverty. <br /> cars than the general population.The highest concentrations of <br /> seniors are on the outer edges of urban areas like Chapel Hill, <br /> prospects for the lives of <br /> Durham, and Mebane. Some areas with a higher density of older childrenthese positive. Research <br /> residents are home to retirement communities. <br /> indicates that children born into poverty <br /> Seniors'transit needs and preferences tend to be different from have a substantiallyhigher lik "' of <br /> those of younger riders. For example, seniors tend to be more remaining impoverished throughout <br /> sensitive to walking distance, because of limits on their physical lives. Orange County's of <br /> ability, or concerns for their personal safety but they are also Health states that •"• of • born into <br /> less sensitive to long waits for transit, typically because they poverty will remain in poverty unless there is <br /> use transit for other reasons than commuting to/from work. signin the system." <br /> ificant change <br /> Likewise, seniors are generally also less likely to be discouraged <br /> by slow or indirect routes. Because of these factors, transit Hispanic and Black - .- <br /> service designed to meet the needs of seniors tends not to meet likely to be impacted . transit inequality. <br /> the needs of riders who are employed, in school, or caring for Transportation decisionsoftenmosbenefit <br /> kids in school who find long waits to be intolerable. • _ whitety <br /> population <br /> Information about ethnicity or race does not alone tell us how who are heavily invested in driving. More <br /> likely someone is to use transit but we must avoid projects data are needed to fully understand <br /> resulting in disproportionate burdens and ensure the equitable resourceshow past transit planning has facilitated <br /> increased <br /> distribution of benefits. Rural parts of Orange County tend to access to transit <br /> have a higher percentage of white residents with fewer Black barriers further disadvantage ' <br /> st <br /> and Hispanic residents. Urbanized areas are more diverse and vulnerableandsolutions ' ' to <br /> neighborhoods have a more even mix of Black, Hispanic, Asian, rectify inequities. <br /> and white residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.