Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 5-c - 2022 Orange County Transit Plan Update – Public Hearing
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 5-c - 2022 Orange County Transit Plan Update – Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 3:04:07 PM
Creation date
10/27/2022 3:07:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-c
Document Relationships
Agenda for November 1, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
OTHER-2022-058-Orange County Transit Plan Update
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 02 orange county. <br /> Housing <br /> • <br /> Residential density is generally concentrated in Chapel EXPRESS The <br /> and Transportation <br /> Hill, Carrboro, Durham, and areas along the FordhamAffordability Index (H+T Index) was <br /> Housing <br /> Boulevard/ Durham-Chapel Hill Boulevard (US 15/501) created <br /> corridor.Areas of higher density(over 10,000 residents • • ' � Neighborhood <br /> _ � •• ••• <br /> per square mile) include Duke University and theTechnology " ' provide <br /> University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Higher density BUS STOP more comprehensive viewof • of ' <br /> areas typically feature multi-family housing and a and housing affordability. Traditional <br /> more traditional development pattern with smaller lots metrics of affordability only c• •- <br /> and higher street network connectivity. There are also housing costs - • determine • • to •- "affordable" <br /> several <br /> - • •-• - <br /> several pockets of higher residential density outside of when monthlyor • •.•- payments accountfor • <br /> downtown Chapel Hill on Fordham Boulevard/Durham- more than 30% of household income. <br /> Chapel Hill Boulevard (US 15/501) and along the Martin metric is that it does n•t account for •• • costs <br /> Luther King, Jr. Boulevard corridor. Hillsborough also in the calculationof monthlyexpenses <br /> features a more traditional grid of streets but residential <br /> lots are larger and density tends to be much lower thanIndex acknowledges • accounts forthe <br /> Chapel Hill or Carrboro. betweenrelationship • • costs and transportation <br /> Outside of downtown Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and costs. For example, in the Triangle Region, housing costs <br /> Hillsborough, development patterns shift to post-war are typically h • •-nse •. <br /> n centers. These <br /> suburban development featuring larger lot sizes, strict tend • be the _ locations that enjoy • _ <br /> ater access <br /> separation of uses, and disconnected, looping street to jobs and better transit service, meaning transportation <br /> patterns. These areas are significantly more difficult costs ' <br /> to serve by transit - higher-density, well-connected <br /> neighborhoods are much better suited for transit In contrast, ' • costs tend to •- lower in locations <br /> service . further from •• but •• are generally further <br /> away and <br /> - - <br /> • ,• - Residents <br /> Residential density drops significantly otthe boundaries in these locations are generally m• - dependent on <br /> of incorporated communities like Chapel Hill and private vehicles and spend more time traveling to and <br /> Carrboro and most of Orange County is rural and very from workday. <br /> low-density(less than 1,000 residents per square mile). <br /> The H+T Index includes both housing AND transportation <br /> While the cost of living in North Carolina remains lower costsy. _ combined <br /> than the national average, over half of all renters _ more household income, <br /> in the state report spending more than 30% of their situation can be considered affordable. <br /> gross monthly income on housing each month. This <br /> figure only incorporates housing costs and likely CNT <br /> underestimates the amount a household spends each mixe • reports <br /> month as it neglects to incorporate transportation services' ' • • •• <br /> costs (see box H+T Index). transit ' amenities" lower transportation <br /> costs, contributing to a higher level of affordability. <br /> Orange County has a relatively high median home <br /> value ($346,200] as compared to Chatham County 54; west of US 15-501 near Chapel Hill; and east of Hillsborough in <br /> ($333,100) or then Durham County ($246,000) (ACS Orange County. Notably, these areas with more affordable housing <br /> 2020 5-year estimates). Median value is a rough are more difficult to serve with useful transit service. <br /> indicator of the relative affordability of the housing <br /> stock in each county.Durham County likely has a higher ,obs <br /> share of affordable and potentially affordable homes. The county's largest employers are UNC Chapel Hill,UNC Health Care, <br /> Most housing falling into an the "affordable" range and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. The county's largest private <br /> (based on Area Median Income) is between 1-40 and US employer is Eurosport(Sports Endeavors, Inc.),a distributor of sports <br /> 15-501(between Chapel Hill and Durham);south of NC- equipment and apparel.Like the region,most residents are employed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.