Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 12-6 - Information Item - Memorandum - Request for Qualifications-Consultant for School Facilities Assessment and Optimization
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 11-01-2022; 12-6 - Information Item - Memorandum - Request for Qualifications-Consultant for School Facilities Assessment and Optimization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 3:01:50 PM
Creation date
10/27/2022 3:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
12-6
Document Relationships
Agenda for November 1, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 11-01-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
101 <br /> viii. Renee: pinpoint all of the things that are problematic, <br /> make a list, and then make a list of what we're looking <br /> for <br /> 1. If we're looking for Mebane#s and Mebane isn't <br /> participating, that's a problem <br /> 2. Do we continue using our formulas with using a <br /> standard 3 bedroom house for generating student <br /> #s (is this still accurate) <br /> 3. Has had issues with SAPFO from day 1 but have <br /> learned to live with it <br /> 4. How do we integrate universal Pre-K#s? <br /> 5. Can bring up at next BOCC meeting but should <br /> put it on the agenda for the next meeting in the <br /> fall <br /> ix. Patrick: did an analysis a few years ago with Craig and <br /> compared actuals with projections based on <br /> developments and found that projects are pretty accurate <br /> (some developments are underestimated and others are <br /> overestimated) <br /> 1. If we're looking at a formula, should run at 100% <br /> capacity rather than 105% for E, 107% for <br /> middle, and 110% for high schools <br /> a. Most districts use 100% <br /> b. Have to have seats for kids when they <br /> show up <br /> c. Eric: agrees about using 100% capacity <br /> #s <br /> x. Carrie: Likes the plan to review this fall but look at <br /> specific problems <br /> 1. Districts can share specific examples of issues <br /> such as the Orange High/Cedar Ridge re- <br /> districting <br /> xi. Jean: What do we do about the older schools in addition <br /> to capacity? <br /> 1. Group has talked about financing, needs of older <br /> schools, what new schools can bring, capacity, <br /> next month talking about design standards <br /> a. What else do we need to talk about that <br /> we haven't addressed to get the full <br /> picture that can be put into a report? <br /> b. Email Jean with any ideas <br /> i. Patrick: safety and security <br /> ii. Rani: school needs <br /> iii. Bonnie: we don't have enough <br /> money to do what we need to do <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.