Browse
Search
Minutes 09-13-2022 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Minutes 09-13-2022 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2022 11:03:49 AM
Creation date
10/19/2022 2:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/13/2022
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 1 - Property Tax Assessment Presentation from UNC School of Government
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 10 - Orange County Parks and Recreation Council – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 11 - Orange Unified Transportation Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 12 - Workforce Development Board - Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 2 - School Capital Needs Work Group Final Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 3 - Animal Services Advisory Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 4 - Arts Commission – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 5 - Board of Health – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 6 - Commission for the Environment – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 7 - Durham Technical Community College – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 8 - Human Relations Commission – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; 9 - Orange County Board of Adjustment – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
Agenda - 09-13-2022; Agenda for September 13, 2022 Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 09-13-2022 Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> Commissioner Bedford asked about the Northside neighborhood. She said that the <br /> blocks are interspersed. She said that the true value is elevated from the sales approach. She <br /> asked if it is appropriate to use an income approach for gentrified neighborhoods like that. <br /> Roger Gunn said that the same approach has to be used for the same type of property. <br /> He said that is because they all have the capacity to be rented or owner occupied. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said that potential use is not the current use and that is hard to <br /> swallow as being fair but that she understands the law. <br /> Roger Gunn said there is no way of them having an idea of what an intended use of a <br /> property might be. <br /> Chris McLaughlin said that the goal is true market value. He said they seek the value <br /> that buyers would pay for similar properties next door to each other, one rented, one not. He <br /> said that sellers would likely sell them for similar prices. <br /> Commissioner Richards asked for examples that show neighborhood comparisons with <br /> assumptions that they are entering the new cycle with. She said they could show two identical <br /> houses and how that might change going into the next revaluation. <br /> Commissioner Bedford asked if there are different variables from neighborhood to <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Leslie Wilcox said if a new home is built, it is assessed through the permitting process. <br /> She said a new construction home is not assessed in the same way as a home that had been <br /> there for 20 years. <br /> 2. School Capital Needs Work Group Final Report <br /> The Board received the Final Report from the School Capital Needs Work Group and provide <br /> direction on next steps. <br /> BACKGROUND: The Capital Needs Work Group (the work group) was established in Fall <br /> 2021 as a result of a petition by Commissioner Jean Hamilton of the Orange County Board of <br /> County Commissioners (BOCC). The petition requested the work group address the capital <br /> needs of the two public school systems in Orange County— Orange County Schools (OCS) and <br /> Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) — especially the older schools, such that an <br /> actionable plan (over 10 years) would be developed that would dedicate funds and a process to <br /> address the needs. <br /> The work group sees value in collaboration and coordinating capital efforts across the BOCC, <br /> County staff and two school districts. The County is responsible for allocating capital funds <br /> amongst the schools and County capital needs. The school districts are responsible for <br /> managing their individual facilities to best meet local needs. In that context, the work group is <br /> interested in continuing to explore ways to improve efficiencies and transparency, and to better <br /> inform decision-making around the capital needs for all its schools. <br /> The work group agreed to present the three recommendations listed below (and as detailed in <br /> Appendix 1) to each of the three elected boards represented on the work group for <br /> consideration and approval: <br /> • Hire a consultant to evaluate the County's approach to school capital planning, design, <br /> contracting, and financing. <br /> • Research alternative funding sources for school capital improvements. <br /> • County and both school districts commit to continue working together on school capital <br /> planning through the existing work group. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.