Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-03-2022; 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Erosion & Sedimentation Control (E&SC) and Stormwater Management
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Agenda - 10-03-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-03-2022; 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Erosion & Sedimentation Control (E&SC) and Stormwater Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2022 3:53:54 PM
Creation date
9/29/2022 3:46:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for October 3, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 10-03-2022 Business Meeting
Minutes 10-03-2022 Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br /> Plan submittal is not considered complete until the appropriate review fees have been <br /> paid in full.51 <br /> Ldp Once an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan has been determined to be complete <br /> by the Erosion Control Officer and the appropriate review fees have been paid in full, <br /> theTlae Erosion Control Officer shall within 30 business days <br /> of re(4pt thei:&of will notify the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan that it hhAs <br /> bew4applicant in writing that the complete Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan has <br /> been: <br /> (1) Approved, <br /> (2) Approved with modifications, or <br /> (3) Approvocl with GoAditiGAS, <br /> (4) Approved with performanGe 52 <br /> (6}131 Disapproved. <br /> (B)(Q Examples of approvals with modifications include , but are not <br /> limited to: <br /> (1) Channel stabilization must be successful or another type of lining must be used; <br /> (2) Delineating certain areas to be graded and stabilized within a specified number <br /> of days to reduce the potential for erosion and protect critical areas; <br /> (4}131 Requiring the -Financially Responsible Party to <br /> retain the services of a professional engineer or architect to supervise <br /> implementation of the approved €r-o&ion, Erosion and Sedimentation Control <br /> PlanSorltrsl RWP. <br /> (G_)LLDisapproval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan plan must specifically state in <br /> writing the reasons for disapproval. <br /> 2.19.6 Timeframe for Review of NGW_53Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan_,54 <br /> Failure by the Igor to approve approve with gonditionc appmVa with <br /> "-An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan shall be deemed approved if not <br /> otherwise acted upon by the Erosion Control Officer within 30 calendar days of the Erosion <br /> Control Officer's determination that the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan submittal is <br /> complete.56 <br /> 2.19.7 Required Revisions <br /> (A) If, following commencement of a Land-Disturbing Activity pursuant <br /> to an approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, the Erosion Control Officer <br /> determines that the . n-Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan-is inadequate to meet <br /> the requirements of the 57 erosion and sedimentation provisions of this Ordinance, the <br /> s1 Added clarification herethat a plan submittal is notconsidered complete until review fees are paid. <br /> 51 "Approved with conditions"and"Approved with performance reservations"havebeen eliminated based on <br /> most current NCAC changes(15A NCAC 046.0118),revised based on NCDEQ peer review comment. <br /> 53 Edit(s)based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> 14 Text correction—added "s". <br /> -54 Thio Sectipp vas clarified/refined hosed nn NQ)EQ PeeF on+ <br /> 56 Edit(s)based on Legal Sufficiency Review comment from July28,2022. <br /> 57 Deleted "soil". <br /> Orange County, North Carolina- Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.