Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-03-2022; 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Erosion & Sedimentation Control (E&SC) and Stormwater Management
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 10-03-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-03-2022; 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Erosion & Sedimentation Control (E&SC) and Stormwater Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2022 3:43:22 PM
Creation date
9/29/2022 3:33:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for October 3, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 10-03-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standagil <br /> Section 6.14:Stormwater Management <br /> (c) Failure to pay the 5-year SCM <br /> maintenance inspection fee shall be deemed a violation of this <br /> Ordinance. <br /> 6 14 106.14.11 Amendments to Approved Plans and SPGGifiGati0nS5CMS247 <br /> (A) Minor Amendments to Approved SCM248 Plans and Specifications <br /> (1) A.mRAdP4e.Ats-Minor amendments to the approved SCM plans and specifications <br /> shall 249 be <br /> approved by the Erosion Control Officer, provided that the proposed250 changes <br /> do not involve a change in the type of the SCM, a change in the location of the <br /> SCM, or an SCM area/volumeg4e increase greater than 50% of the approved <br /> SCM area/volume 251 <br /> (2) Proposed changes shall be prepared by a North Carolina registered professional <br /> engineer or landscape architect (to the extent that t-3,--General Statutes Chapter <br /> 89A: allows)252 and submitted for review by the Erosion Control Officer. <br /> (3) Erosion Control Officer Review <br /> (a) If the Erosion Control Officer approves the proposed changes, the <br /> owning entity of the SCM shall file sealed <br /> copies of the revisions with the Erosion Control Officer. <br /> (b) If the Erosion Control Officer disapproves the proposed253 changes, the <br /> proposal shallp4ayz54 be revised and resubmitted as a new proposal. If <br /> the proposal has not been revised and is essentially the same as that <br /> already reviewed, it shall be returned to the aPPI+s@Atowning entity255 <br /> (c) The Erosion Control Officer shall report any such revisions to the @-9aa"-d <br /> t+ngPlanning Director. <br /> (B) Major Amendments to Approved SCM256 Plans and Specifications <br /> (1) Major amendments to the approved SCM plans and <br /> specifications <br /> which involve a change in the type of the SCM, a change in the location of the <br /> SCM, or an SCM area/volume increase greater than 50% of the approved SCM <br /> area/volume shall X57- be approved by the <br /> Board At CA-d-Aty GOMPAiGgi Planning Director258 after receiving a <br /> recommendation from the Erosion Control Officer. <br /> 247 Section 6.14.11 describes the processes for amendments/revisions to approved SCM plans and specifications, <br /> aswell as a mendments/revi s ions to the SCM Operationand Maintenance Agreement, sothetitleofSection <br /> 6.14.11 has been revised to"Amendments to Approved SCMs". <br /> 248 Clarification thatthis sub-section is referencing"Approved SCM" Plans and Specifications. <br /> 249 Edit(s)based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments <br /> 210 Text correction—added "proposed". <br /> 211 Clarification ofrequirements. <br /> 212 Text corrections. <br /> 218 Text correction—added "proposed". <br /> 254 Edit(s)based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments <br /> 251 Consi stent use of"owning entity". <br /> 216 Clarification thatthis sub-section is referencing"Approved SCM" Plans and Specifications. <br /> 257 Edit(s)based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments <br /> 218 Consistencywith current state lawand Model Ordinances. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina— Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.